Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Benjamin Mitton

The Royal Court rejected a no case to answer submission in a three-count criminal trial, holding the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to go to the jury.

  • No case to answer
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Larceny
  • Transferring criminal property
  • Sufficiency of evidence
  • No-case-to-answer
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] JRC 115

AG v Mitton (Royal Court : Hearing

AG v Mitton (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal)) [2025] JRC 115 (25 April 2025)

The Royal Court of Jersey rejected a no-case submission on larceny and transferring criminal property, holding the circumstantial evidence could support conviction.

  • Larceny
  • Transferring criminal property
  • No case to answer
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • No-case-to-answer
  • Circumstantial-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] JRC 184

AG v R

AG v R [2024] JRC 184 (12 September 2024)

The Royal Court held there was no case to answer on sexual-offence counts involving massages of two children, finding no evidence the touching was sexual.

  • Sexual offences
  • Burden of proof
  • No case to answer
  • Criminal-law
  • Sexual-offences
  • No-case-to-answer
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] JRC 208

AG v Yuksel 23-Oct-2019

AG v Yuksel 23-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 208 (23 October 2019)

The Royal Court held there was no case to answer on nine counts of fraudulent conversion because the prosecution had not shown the money was entrusted for a specific purpose.

  • Fraudulent conversion
  • Entrustment
  • Elements of offence
  • No case to answer
  • Fraudulent-conversion
  • No-case-to-answer
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2003] JLR 623

Att. Gen. v Capuano

Att. Gen. v Capuano [2003] JLR 623 (18 November 2003)

A criminal procedure decision on a no-case-to-answer submission: the case should not go to the jury if, even taking the prosecution evidence at its highest, conviction would not be open.

  • Case to answer
  • No case to answer
  • Jury directions
  • Criminal-procedure
  • No-case-to-answer
  • Jury-directions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.