A v. H
A v. H [2016] 2 JLR_Note 1 (07 July 2016)
A Jersey civil procedure note on pleading fraud: allegations of fraud must be specifically pleaded and particularized.
- Pleading
- Fraud
- Civil-procedure
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked
Jersey Case Law
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
- Courts on this page
- 0 court collections
- Last checked
Search and filter Jersey case law
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Voisin Executors Ltd. v. Kelleher
Voisin Executors Ltd. v. Kelleher [2016] 1 JLR_Note 16 (29 February 2016)
Interlocutory civil procedure note on whether an amendment to pleadings should be allowed, reflecting the court’s discretion in Jersey procedure.
- Pleading
- Amendment
- Civil-procedure
- Pleading-amendment
Crociani v. Crociani
Crociani v. Crociani [2015] 2 JLR_Note 4 (27 August 2015)
A Jersey civil procedure note addressing the principles governing whether amendment to pleadings should be permitted in interlocutory proceedings.
- Pleading
- Amendment
- Civil-procedure
Viera v Kordas
Viera v Kordas [2014] 1 JLR_Note 9 (11 December 2013)
Civil procedure note on whether a pleading should be struck out in Viera v Kordas.
- Pleading
- Striking out
- Civil-procedure
- Striking-out
In re Syvret v
In re Syvret v [2014] 1 JLR 71 (10 December 2013)
The case states when the Bailiff should sign an order of justice for a litigant in person under Royal Court Rules 2004 r.20/5(1).
- Signature of bailiff
- Access to justice
- Royal court rules 2004 r.20/5(1)
- Civil-procedure
- Access-to-justice
- Pleading
Brazil v Durant Intl.
Brazil v Durant Intl. [2011] JLR_Note 19 (27 April 2011)
A Jersey civil procedure note reaffirming that pleadings exist to define the issues in dispute between the parties.
- Pleading
- Purpose of pleadings
- Civil-procedure
- Issues-in-dispute
Leeds United v Admatch
Leeds United v Admatch [2011] JLR_Note 1 (19 January 2011)
Civil procedure note on an application to strike out a pleading, concerning the court’s power to remove claims disclosing no reasonable cause of action or amounting to an abuse of process.
- Pleading
- Striking out
- Civil-procedure
- Striking-out
Alhamrani v Alhamrani
Alhamrani v Alhamrani [2009] JLR 301 (24 July 2009)
In an interlocutory civil procedure dispute, the court held that a pleading should be struck out for fraud or dishonesty only where trial fairness is imperilled.
- Pleading
- Striking out
- Fraudulent conduct
- Disclosure
- Civil-procedure
- Striking-out
Marett v O'Brien
Marett v O'Brien [2009] JLR_Note 36 (23 July 2009)
A Jersey note on pleading in matrimonial proceedings, emphasizing that proper pleading is required in family cases.
- Pleading
- Matrimonial proceedings
- Civil-procedure
- Family-law
- Matrimonial-proceedings
Alhamrani v Alhamrani
Alhamrani v Alhamrani [2008] JLR_Note 45 (03 November 2008)
A Jersey civil procedure note concerning an application to strike out pleadings, focused on whether the pleadings disclosed a valid cause of action.
- Pleading
- Striking out
- Civil-procedure
- Striking-out
Explore more