Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG v Anthony (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal)) [2025] JRC 021 (21 January 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey admitted a 999 call and initial body-cam statements as res gestae, but excluded later police-account evidence and bad character evidence.
AG v N [2024] JRC 251 (18 November 2024)
Pre-trial ruling on hearsay in a domestic abuse prosecution. Res gestae statements from a 999 call and body-worn video were admitted; the complainant’s later statement was excluded.
AG v Mills [2021] JRC 178 (21 June 2021)
Pre-trial rulings on hearsay, res gestae, bad character evidence, and the admissibility of three police interviews in a sexual offence prosecution.
AG -v- McKeegans [2018] JRC 063 (23 March 2018)
Pre-trial ruling on body-worn camera hearsay evidence. The court admitted Victim A’s statements, admitted Victim C’s statements in principle, and adjourned Article 76 issues for Victim C.
AG -v- Barrett [2016] JRC 047A (23 February 2016)
The Jersey Royal Court refused a defence application to admit a father's statement to police as res gestae, finding the spontaneity and anti-concoction test was not met.
AG -v- Dubois and Dubois [2015] JRC 005 (12 January 2015)
Pre-trial criminal ruling on witness screens, police interview edits, and bodycam evidence. The court refused screens, allowed interview passages, and admitted relevant bodycam recordings.
Att. Gen. v Breckon [2012] 2 JLR_Note 25 (23 October 2012)
A Jersey Law Reports note considering whether hearsay evidence was admissible under the res gestae exception.
Shewan v Att. Gen. [2006] JLR 79 (27 January 2006)
The court held that a victim’s immediate post-assault identification of the offender was admissible as res gestae hearsay, despite animosity between the parties.
Att. Gen. v Cronin [2001] JLR_Note 44 (24 September 2001)
Interlocutory criminal ruling on whether a victim’s statement was admissible as part of the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule.
Explore more
