Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2026] JRC 035

Y v AG (Royal Court : Hearing

Y v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : MacRae) [2026] JRC 035 (28 January 2026)

The Royal Court of Jersey heard a sex offender denotification application in private and removed notification requirements after finding current risk no longer justified them.

  • Sex offender notification requirements
  • Risk assessment
  • Private hearings
  • Sex-offender-notification
  • Risk-assessment
  • Private-hearings
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] JRC 037

D v AG (Royal Court : Hearing

D v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal)) [2025] JRC 037 (4 February 2025)

The Royal Court of Jersey granted an application to end sex offender notification requirements, finding the applicant posed a low risk and that private hearing was justified.

  • Sex offender notification requirements
  • Privacy of proceedings
  • Risk assessment
  • Termination of notification obligations
  • Sex-offender-notification
  • Private-hearings
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] JRC 066

AG v Skinner Skips Limited

AG v Skinner Skips Limited [2024] JRC 066 (22 March 2024)

The Jersey Royal Court fined a company ÂŁ55,000 after conviction for failing to protect employees under health and safety law following a serious workplace accident.

  • Employer's duty of care
  • Workplace safety
  • Risk assessment
  • Sentencing for health and safety offences
  • Health-and-safety-law
  • Workplace-safety
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] JRC 044

V v AG

V v AG [2024] JRC 044 (23 February 2024)

The Royal Court heard a denotification application under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010, ordered the hearing to be private, and granted removal from notification requirements.

  • Sex offenders register
  • Open justice
  • Denotification orders
  • Risk assessment
  • Sex-offenders-register
  • Denotification-orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] JRC 002

Z v AG

Z v AG [2024] JRC 002 (03 January 2024)

The Jersey Royal Court granted Z’s application to end sex offender notification requirements, finding the remaining risk did not justify continued registration.

  • Sex offender notification requirements
  • Risk assessment
  • Proportionality
  • Privacy
  • Sex-offender-notification
  • Risk-assessment
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] JRC 136

K v AG

K v AG [2023] JRC 136 (01 August 2023)

The court granted an application to end sex offender notification requirements after finding the applicant presented a low risk of re-offending.

  • Sex offenders register
  • Notification requirements
  • Risk assessment
  • Application for removal from register
  • Sex-offenders-register
  • Notification-requirements
Read case analysis
Family law [2023] JRC 041

In the matter of FF (Supervision Order extension) 14 Mar 2023

In the matter of FF (Supervision Order extension) 14 Mar 2023 [2023] JRC 041 (14 March 2023)

The Royal Court extended FF’s supervision order for 12 months and kept C’s direct contact supervised by the Children’s Service, citing ongoing safeguarding concerns.

  • Supervision order
  • Contact arrangements
  • Child welfare
  • Risk assessment
  • Extradition
  • Sexual offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] JRC 017

Representation of B

Representation of B [2023] JRC 017 (25 January 2023)

The Jersey Royal Court lifted sex offender notification requirements after finding the applicant posed a low risk of reoffending and no longer justified continued registration.

  • Sex offenders register
  • Notification requirements
  • Risk assessment
  • Removal from register
  • Sex-offenders-register
  • Notification-requirements
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2022] JRC 249

AG v ROK Homes Limited

AG v ROK Homes Limited [2022] JRC 249 (11 November 2022)

The court held that an electrical cable had to be live to count as an “existing electrical service” under Regulation 21, and addressed when construction work begins for that duty.

  • Interpretation of 'existing services'
  • Duties before commencement of construction work
  • Risk assessment
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Health-and-safety
  • Construction-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] JRC 189

K v AG

K v AG [2022] JRC 189 (13 September 2022)

The Royal Court in Jersey discharged an applicant from sex offender notification requirements after finding his current risk of sexual harm no longer justified them.

  • Sex offenders register
  • Notification requirements
  • Risk assessment
  • Discharge of orders
  • Sex-offenders-register
  • Notification-requirements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.