Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Representation of Coinshares International Limited (Royal Court : Costs (Civil) : Temple : Companies) [2026] JRC 079 (18 March 2026)
The Royal Court of Jersey approved convening a single class meeting for CoinShares’ proposed scheme of arrangement, finding no need for separate meetings.
LXB Retail Properties PLC [2018] JRC 049 (05 March 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that LXB Retail Properties PLC’s proposed scheme of arrangement fell within Articles 125 and 127 of the Companies Law and ordered a meeting of members.
In re Heritage Oil plc [2014] 2 JLR_Note 23 (17 September 2014)
The court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement for Heritage Oil plc under Jersey company law after finding the statutory requirements were met.
In re Ashburton Global Funds v [2014] 1 JLR_Note 12 (09 January 2014)
A Jersey company-law note on whether a scheme of arrangement can involve protected cells, holding it is permissible if statutory requirements are met.
In re GCP Infrastructure Fund v [2014] 1 JLR_Note 11 (07 January 2014)
A Jersey company law note on sanctioning a scheme of arrangement, focused on whether the classes of members or creditors were properly constituted.
In re Cazenove Capital Holdings Ltd. v [2013] 2 JLR_Note 18 (27 August 2013)
The court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement for Cazenove Capital Holdings Ltd., being satisfied that statutory requirements were met and the scheme was fair and reasonable.
In re Cazenove Capital Holdings Ltd. v [2013] 2 JLR_Note 8 (26 June 2013)
The court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement for Cazenove Capital Holdings Ltd., finding the statutory requirements were met and the scheme was fair.
In re APIC Petroleum Corp. v [2013] 1 JLR_Note 3 (10 December 2012)
The court sanctioned a proposed scheme of arrangement for APIC Petroleum Corp., applying company law requirements that such schemes be fair and reasonable.
In re FRM Holdings v [2012] 2 JLR_Note 13 (18 June 2012)
The court sanctioned FRM Holdings’ scheme of arrangement after finding the statutory requirements were satisfied and the proposal fair and reasonable.
Representation of FRM Holdings Limited [2012] JRC 120 (18 June 2012)
The Royal Court of Jersey ordered separate class meetings for loanholder and non-loanholder shareholders under a scheme of arrangement to assess a proposed acquisition of FRM Holdings.
Explore more
