Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Company law [2022] JRC 106

Pender v GGH (Jersey) Limited and Ors

Pender v GGH (Jersey) Limited and Ors [2022] JRC 106 (11 May 2022)

The Royal Court of Jersey ordered the plaintiff to provide additional security for costs of ÂŁ750,000, bringing total security to ÂŁ1.25 million in a shareholder unfair-prejudice dispute.

  • Security for costs
  • Unfair prejudice
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Costs quantification
  • Security-for-costs
  • Shareholder-disputes
Read case analysis
Company law [2020] JRC 109

Pender v GGH (Jersey) and Ors

Pender v GGH (Jersey) and Ors [2020] JRC 109 (08 June 2020)

Interlocutory directions decision in an unfair prejudice claim. The court refused a stay, ordered proportionate discovery, and directed sequential expert valuation evidence.

  • Unfair prejudice
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Discovery
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Valuation of shares
  • Unfair-prejudice
Read case analysis
Company law [2016] JRC 140

Gibbons -v- Monarch Investments Limited

Gibbons -v- Monarch Investments Limited [2016] JRC 140 (15 August 2016)

The Jersey Royal Court refused a declaration that Monarch Investments Limited’s substratum had been lost, finding the company could still achieve its main objects.

  • Just and equitable winding up
  • Loss of substratum
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Corporate governance
  • Company-law
  • Just-and-equitable-winding-up
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2015] JRC 078

Gas Plus Khalakan Ltd -v- New Age and Range Energy Resources

Gas Plus Khalakan Ltd -v- New Age and Range Energy Resources [2015] JRC 078 (22 April 2015)

The Master held he had no jurisdiction to grant injunctions on summary judgment, except by consent, and referred the summary judgment application to the Royal Court.

  • Jurisdiction of master/judicial greffier
  • Injunctive relief
  • Summary judgment
  • Variation of injunctions
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Arbitration award enforcement
Read case analysis
Arbitration [2015] JCA 061

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others [2015] JCA 061 (27 March 2015)

The Court of Appeal held that most shareholder and joint-venture disputes had to go to New York arbitration, but note and guarantee claims stayed in Jersey courts.

  • Arbitration agreements
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Unfair prejudice
  • Winding up on just and equitable grounds
  • Arbitration-agreement
Read case analysis
Company law [2014] JRC 169

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others [2014] JRC 169 (11 September 2014)

The Jersey Royal Court refused a stay of unfair prejudice proceedings, finding fraud allegations engaged Article 27 and justified refusing arbitration.

  • Arbitration agreement
  • Jurisdiction
  • Unfair prejudice
  • Winding up
  • Fraud allegations
  • Shareholder disputes
Read case analysis
Company law [2014] JRC 132

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others

Consolidated Resources Armenia -v- Global Gold and Others [2014] JRC 132 (18 June 2014)

The Royal Court refused default judgment against a deadlocked joint venture company, holding that a fair trial was not possible and the status quo should be preserved.

  • Joint venture
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Default judgment
  • Injunctions
  • Unfair prejudice
  • Winding up
Read case analysis
Contract law [2014] JRC 079

Home Farm Developments Ltd, Strata Developments Ltd and Holmes -v- Le Sueur

Home Farm Developments Ltd, Strata Developments Ltd and Holmes -v- Le Sueur [2014] JRC 079 (26 March 2014)

The Royal Court of Jersey struck out claims by Home Farm Developments, Strata Development and Shane Holmes, holding they were barred by a binding settlement and were an abuse of process.

  • Settlement agreements
  • Strike out applications
  • Abuse of process
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Strike-out-applications
Read case analysis
Equity [2009] JRC 139

Chilukuri and Others -v- RS Holdings Limited and Others

Chilukuri and Others -v- RS Holdings Limited and Others [2009] JRC 139 (14 July 2009)

The Jersey Royal Court refused to discharge interim injunctions preserving shares and related rights in a disputed hotel development, finding a serious issue to try.

  • Interim injunctions
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Conspiracy
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Remedies
  • Adequacy of damages
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2005] JRC 073

Bridgen and Ports Trading Limited

Bridgen and Ports Trading Limited [2005] JRC 073 (02 June 2005)

The Royal Court refused Mr Bridgen’s application to declare Ports Trading Limited en désastre, finding his creditor status uncertain and, in any event, exercising discretion to dismiss it.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Creditor status
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Corporate re-organisation
  • Directors' duties
  • Declaration-en-desastre
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.