Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
HSBC Bank PLc v David Hick Antiques Limited and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil)) [2025] JRC 072 (17 March 2025)
The Royal Court refused specific discovery of HSBC files about other IRHP complaints linked to Debbie Parker, and held a 2013 internal review privileged.
E -v- AG [2018] JRC 111 (27 June 2018)
Appeal against Youth Court conviction dismissed. The court held disclosure had been inadequate but not unfair, and upheld joinder and the conviction.
AG -v- R [2017] JRC 173 (19 October 2017)
The court held that most proposed background evidence was admissible in an indecent assault prosecution, but excluded a pornographic magazine as too prejudicial.
AG -v- Cullen [2016] JRC 224 (06 December 2016)
The court held that four indecent assault counts were properly joined, refused severance, and allowed Complainant 2 to testify behind a screen.
AG -v- Brennan [2016] JRC 199E (04 November 2016)
The Royal Court refused a defence application to exclude evidence of earlier Jersey visits and a May 2016 cocaine conviction in a criminal property case.
AG -v- Bacon [2016] JRC 181 (06 October 2016)
The court refused to stay sexual offence counts despite an earlier caution, admitted a 1985 confession, allowed joinder of Counts 1-8, and admitted spanking images but excluded Reading evidence.
AG -v- T [2014] JRC 039 (13 February 2014)
Pre-trial criminal ruling admitting similar fact evidence from Witness A and refusing to override the Crown’s discretion not to call Witness B.
H v Att. Gen. [2013] 1 JLR 210 (21 March 2013)
The court held that evidence of similar indecent assaults was mutually admissible on each charge and highly relevant to rebut the accused’s claim of innocence.
AG -v- A [2012] JRC 032 (07 February 2012)
The court admitted alleged confession and computer evidence in a sexual offences case, finding the material relevant and not unfairly prejudicial.
AG -v- U [2011] JRC 124 (24 July 2011)
The court admitted prejudicial evidence to rebut the defence’s likely claim that someone else downloaded indecent images found on the defendant’s computer.
Explore more
