Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2014] JRC 187

Hong Kong Foods Ltd and Another -v- Robin Hood and Another

Hong Kong Foods Ltd and Another -v- Robin Hood and Another [2014] JRC 187 (29 September 2014)

The Royal Court of Jersey allowed a delayed action to continue despite a breach of procedural rules, but ordered the plaintiffs to pay costs on the standard basis.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Assignment of lease
  • Delay in prosecution
  • Counterclaim
  • Mediation
  • Costs sanctions
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2013] JRC 251

Viera -v- Kordas and The Motor Insurers' Bureau

Viera -v- Kordas and The Motor Insurers' Bureau [2013] JRC 251 (11 December 2013)

The Royal Court struck out a road traffic claim for inordinate, inexcusable delay, holding the action was an abuse of process and that a fair trial was no longer possible.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Abuse of process
  • Road traffic accident
  • Limitation period
  • Delay in litigation
  • Abuse-of-process
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2013] JRC 183A

Begg -v- Raynes

Begg -v- Raynes [2013] JRC 183A (19 September 2013)

The Master struck out an action for unpaid legal fees because the plaintiff’s delay was inordinate and inexcusable, and no order as to costs was made.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Adjudication of legal fees
  • Delay in litigation
  • Case management
  • Strike-out-for-want-of-prosecution
  • Delay-in-litigation
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2006] JCA 025

Cooney -v- Mann 13-Feb-2006

Cooney -v- Mann 13-Feb-2006 [2006] JCA 025 (13 February 2006)

The Jersey Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to strike out a claim for want of prosecution, holding the delay was inordinate and inexcusable but not enough to disturb the Master’s discretion.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Judicial discretion
  • Delay in prosecution
  • Civil-procedure
  • Want-of-prosecution
  • Strike-out
Read case analysis
Company law [2004] JRC 131

Gamlestaden Fastigheter Ab v Baltic Partners Limit

Gamlestaden Fastigheter Ab v Baltic Partners Limit [2004] JRC 131 (22 July 2004)

The Jersey Royal Court struck out Gamlestaden’s unfair prejudice representation, holding there was no shareholder value in an insolvent company and that the claim was also barred by delay.

  • Unfair prejudice
  • Shareholder remedies
  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Jurisdiction under companies (jersey) law
  • Unfair-prejudice
  • Shareholder-remedies
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2004] JRC 103

Boyd v Pickersgill and Le Cornu

Boyd v Pickersgill and Le Cornu [2004] JRC 103 (09 June 2004)

The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a professional negligence claim for want of prosecution after finding inordinate, inexcusable delay and serious prejudice.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Delay
  • Prejudice
  • Prescription
  • Professional negligence
  • Breach of contract
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2003] JRC 114A

Bourne -v- Axford, Russell, Collins, Lewin, Russell Limebeer, Lloyds Bank Plc and Sierra Trust Company Limited

Bourne -v- Axford, Russell, Collins, Lewin, Russell Limebeer, Lloyds Bank Plc and Sierra Trust Company Limited [2003] JRC 114A (07 July 2003)

The Royal Court appeal was dismissed: the plaintiff’s inordinate delay in prosecuting a land-development dispute created a serious risk of unfair trial from faded witness recollection.

  • Delay in prosecution
  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Prejudice to fair trial
  • Costs
  • Leave to appeal
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2003] JRC 025

de Moulipied v Sturdy

de Moulipied v Sturdy [2003] JRC 025 (04 February 2003)

The Royal Court of Jersey struck out a personal injury claim for want of prosecution after finding inordinate, inexcusable delay and likely prejudice to the defendant.

  • Strike out for want of prosecution
  • Inordinate and inexcusable delay
  • Prejudice to defendant
  • Fair trial
  • Case management
  • Want-of-prosecution
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.