Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
A.S. Airline Services (C.I.) Limited v Ports of Jersey Limited [2023] JRC 230 (21 November 2023)
The Royal Court held that restoring the dissolved plaintiff company to the Register left its licence agreement extant, because the agreement did not permit termination on dissolution.
TM Ruane Limited v Gale [2023] JRC 074 (10 May 2023)
Summary judgment was refused in a building-contract dispute because both the claim and counterclaim raised live factual and legal issues requiring trial.
Hore and Anor v Valmorbida and Anor - [2022] JRC 202 (30 September 2022)
The Jersey Royal Court held that fraud vitiated consent to a Settlement Agreement in an art joint venture, setting it aside and awarding restitution and damages.
Murray v Camerons Limited [2020] JRC 179 (08 September 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court held that the parties’ relationship for the main works was governed by a JCT Standard Contract basis, not just the Letter of Intent.
Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International (STP) Inc -v- HRCKY Ltd [2013] JRC 244B (19 December 2013)
The Jersey Royal Court granted partial summary judgment for unpaid franchise fees, held the franchise was lawfully terminated, and struck out parts of the defence.
Grove and Briscoe -v- Baker [2005] JRC 095 (11 July 2005)
The court held that late interest payments did not justify terminating the loan, but the loan was repayable on formal demand and judgment was entered for the plaintiffs.
Grove v Baker [2005] JLR 348 (11 July 2005)
The court held that late payment of interest did not amount to a fundamental breach justifying termination of the loan contract.
Education Committee v Aegon Insurance [2002] JRC 162 (03 September 2002)
The court held Aegon liable under a performance bond after Mark Amy abandoned a school redevelopment contract. The States had acted reasonably in mitigation.
Hamon v Webster [2002] JRC 138 (19 July 2002)
A neighbour dispute over building works and a promised lease ended with the court holding the written agreement, as varied, was binding and the plaintiff failed to finish on time.
Eckman v Saco Defense [2001] JRC 206 (17 October 2001)
The court ordered an account on the MODA contracts, holding that expenses were capped at $650,000 to end-1995 and that an exceptional profit item must be included.
Explore more
