[2025] KEHC 10205 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant, having been sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for defilement, is entitled under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to have the period spent in remand custody prior to sentencing deducted from his custodial sentence. The record showed the applicant was in remand for 1 year and 6 months, excluding 4 months when he was out on bond. The court found that the trial court did not factor this period into the sentence computation. Accordingly, the committal warrant to prison should be reviewed to reflect the remission of the period already served in remand custody, ensuring the applicant's sentence is reduced by the time spent in pre-trial detention.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 10205 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gabriel Githiora; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2025
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E073 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation Application
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Computation, Remand Custody Credit, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Application of Section 333 2 Cpc
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gabriel Githiora
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody deducted from his custodial sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the applicant's sentence should be deemed to have commenced from the date he was placed in pre-trial custody, excluding the period he was out on bond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant, having been sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for defilement, is entitled under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to have the period spent in remand custody prior to sentencing deducted from his custodial sentence. The record showed the applicant was in remand for 1 year and 6 months, excluding 4 months when he was out on bond. The court found that the trial court did not factor this period into the sentence computation. Accordingly, the committal warrant to prison should be reviewed to reflect the remission of the period already served in remand custody, ensuring the applicant's sentence is reduced by the time spent in pre-trial detention.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The committal warrant to prison shall be reviewed to reflect a remission of 1 year and 6 months spent in remand custody by the applicant.
- The applicant's custodial sentence shall be computed in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment