Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Cheruiyot v Republic [2025] KEHC 10450 (KLR)
The High Court held that the applicant’s sentence must run from the date of arrest, applying section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to custody time.
Githiora v Republic [2025] KEHC 10205 (KLR)
The High Court held that the applicant was entitled to credit for 1 year 6 months spent in remand custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ochieng v Republic [2025] KEHC 9319 (KLR)
The High Court at Kisumu held that Polycap Ochieng’s 7-year sentence must be computed from the date he was first remanded in custody, applying section 333(2).
Ochieng alias Dan v Republic [2025] KEHC 8495 (KLR)
The High Court at Kisumu declined a resentencing application, holding it lacked jurisdiction because the Court of Appeal had already substituted the sentence.
Kipkorir v Republic [2025] KEHC 8221 (KLR)
The High Court at Eldoret allowed a criminal revision and ordered that time spent in remand custody be credited in sentence computation under section 333(2) CPC.
Ngwiri v Republic [2025] KEHC 5512 (KLR)
The High Court granted a sentence review after finding the trial court failed to credit two months spent in remand custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Kipkemei v Republic [2025] KEHC 4373 (KLR)
A sentence of imprisonment must run from the date of arrest where the court has taken into account the period spent in custody before sentencing, in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, to effectively reduce the imposed sentence for the period already served.
Source excerpt
Mungai v Republic [2025] KEHC 3888 (KLR)
The court's failure to consider the period spent in custody by the petitioner before sentencing, as mandated by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, warranted a review and adjustment of the sentence commencement date.
Source excerpt
Mang’ondo v Republic [2025] KEHC 3753 (KLR)
The High Court corrected a sentence-computation error and directed that the applicant receive credit for the full pre-trial custody period under section 333(2).
Keya v Republic [2025] KEHC 3670 (KLR)
The failure of the trial court to factor in the period the applicant spent in remand custody before sentencing was a violation of the mandatory requirement of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, necessitating a review of the sentence to reflect the time served.
Source excerpt
Explore more
