Republic v Mate
Republic v Mate (Criminal Case E999 of 2024) [2026] KEMC 505 (KLR) (12 August 2026) (Ruling)
The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case because no eye witness identified the accused as the thief, the complainant did not see the taking, the accused was not recovered with the stolen items, and the evidence did not sufficiently prove that he was the person who committed the theft. The court therefore upheld the no-case position and acquitted the accused at the close of the prosecution case.
Source excerpt
- Stealing/theft
- Prima facie case
- No case to answer
- Burden and standard of proof
- Acquittal at close of prosecution case