Musuna v Abdullahi
Musuna v Abdullahi (Environment and Land Case E005 of 2022) [2026] KEMC 703 (KLR) (12 August 2026) (Judgment)
The Plaintiff failed to prove that the 2014 agreement was void or voidable so as to justify rescission. The evidence showed that both parties had partially performed and that neither had completed their obligations: the Plaintiff had not transferred the land, while the Defendant had not caused the motor vehicle to be transferred into the Plaintiff's name. Because both parties remained willing to complete the bargain, and because specific performance was the most efficacious equitable remedy in the circumstances, the court upheld the agreement and granted specific performance on both sides.
Source excerpt
- Rescission
- Specific performance
- Misrepresentation
- Failure of consideration
- Capacity to contract
- Restitution