Oketch & another v Maeta
Oketch & another v Maeta (Civil Miscellaneous E298 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13072 (KLR) (12 August 2026) (Ruling)
The Applicants failed to give a satisfactory explanation for a 95-day delay after judgment and 65 days after expiry of the statutory appeal period. They provided no evidence of diligent follow-up during the period of inaction, and the court declined to exercise discretion to enlarge time. Once leave to appeal out of time was refused, the stay prayers collapsed automatically.
Source excerpt
- Extension of time
- Stay of execution
- Inordinate delay
- Security for due performance
- Appellate discretion