In re Baby JWM (Minor)
In re Baby JWM (Minor) (Miscellaneous Application E023 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 11777 (KLR) (Family) (30 July 2026) (Ruling)
The Court held that despite technically defective email service, it could proceed in the interests of justice because the 3rd Respondent could not be located and the DNA evidence conclusively proved the 1st Applicant was the biological father. The birth record therefore contained untrue and misleading information, which the Court had constitutional power under Article 35(2) to order corrected. The requested changes also served the minor's best interests under Article 53.
Source excerpt
- Paternity determination
- Birth certificate rectification
- Dna evidence
- Electronic service
- Best interests of the child
- Correction of untrue information