The court awarded MCB USD 6.5 million against Jade Petroleum only, holding subrogation supported reimbursement, but the guarantors were not liable without proof of contractual demand.
The High Court allowed amendments to the succession petition, corrected the beneficiary and asset schedule, and issued an amended certificate of confirmation of grant.
Kagali v Yalaist & another (Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 5364 (KLR) (31 August 2026) (Judgment)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2024
Judge
["EK Wabwoto"]
The appeal was partly allowed. The court upheld refusal of specific performance and cancellation of title, but added Kshs. 170,000 for proved litigation expenses.
Otieno v Nyakongo (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E023 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 5365 (KLR) (31 August 2026) (Ruling)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E023 of 2026
Judge
["FO Nyagaka"]
The court dismissed an injunction and stay application as a collateral attempt to halt execution of an existing eviction decree, and awarded costs to the respondent.
Nyagowa v Olum & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E007 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 5362 (KLR) (31 August 2026) (Judgment)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
Environment and Land Appeal E007 of 2026
Judge
["EK Wabwoto"]
The appeal succeeded after the court held that the refusal of temporary injunction turned on contested co-ownership and succession issues that should not have been finally decided at interlocutory stage.
Omari v Tuku & 3 others (Environment and Land Case E063 of 2026) [2026] KEMC 789 (KLR) (27 August 2026) (Ruling)
Court
Magistrate's Court
Case number
Environment and Land Case E063 of 2026
Judge
["EM Mwamuye"]
The Notice of Motion could not stand as an interlocutory application in the absence of a demonstrated plaint or other valid originating process constituting a substantive suit. That absence was not a mere technicality but a jurisdictional defect. Independently, the Applicant also failed to meet the higher threshold for interlocutory mandatory relief because the transaction history, alleged payment disputes, substitute parcel claim, and competing possession questions were too contested for final interlocutory orders.
Migot (Formerly Daudi Odhiambo Migot) v Otieno (Personal Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Jemima Akinyi Oyare) (Environment and Land Appeal 57 of 2019) [2026] KEELC 5344 (KLR) (21 August 2026) (Judgment)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
Environment and Land Appeal 57 of 2019
Judge
["EK Wabwoto"]
The appeal against the interlocutory ruling was incompetent because the ruling was a consent order and the appeal was filed out of time without leave. The sale of the deceased’s land before grant confirmation was void under section 45, but the respondent was still entitled to restitution of the purchase price because the appellant’s family received the money while the appellant later took title to the land himself, creating unjust enrichment. The trial court properly dismissed the appellant’s trespass claim and awarded refund, interest and costs.