Matey v Safaricom PLC
The High Court partly allowed a subscriber's application compelling Safaricom to disclose access logs and records of requests for her mobile numbers and M-Pesa data, holding that Articles 31 and 35 and the Data Protection Act apply, but refusing to order creation of non-existent records.
- Right to privacy under article 31 of the constitution
- Right of access to information under article 35 of the constitution
- Access to information act, 2016, sections 4, 5, 8 and 9
- Data protection act, 2019, sections 25 and 26
- Disclosure of subscriber and m-pesa account information
- Court-compelled production of records within a party's possession, custody or control