Murimi & 2 others (p/a Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago and Muchela Advocates) v APA Insurance Co. Ltd
Murimi & 2 others (p/a Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago and Muchela Advocates) v APA Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E363 of 2025) [2026] KEHC-DR 16 (KLR) (26 August 2026) (Ruling)
The matter’s subject value could not be determined from the record, so the taxing officer applied Schedule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014. Considering the nature of the matter and the applicable principles, the claimed instruction fee of Kshs.65,000 was excessive and was taxed down by Kshs.15,000. Attendances and disbursements were allowed as drawn because they were reasonable and supported. Applying advocate-client scaling and VAT, the bill was taxed at Kshs.177,906.30.
Source excerpt
- Taxation of advocate-client bill of costs
- Instruction fees
- Discretion of taxing officer
- Vat on legal fees
- Reasonableness of costs