Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law [2026] KEELC 5276 (KLR)

Kasarani Juakali Resettlement Project Ltd v Kinuthia & another (Appeal E008 of 2021)

Kasarani Juakali Resettlement Project Ltd v Kinuthia & another (Appeal E008 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 5276 (KLR) (6 August 2026) (Judgment)

The court held that the Appellant was not a stranger to the transaction in substance because it confirmed ownership records, issued the ownership certificate, received fees, and participated in the identification and subsequent mediation over the wrong plot. That conduct supported liability for the fraudulent and failed transaction. The court also found the 2nd Respondent equally liable because his evidence was uncontroverted and he was the principal vendor in the sale agreement. The award of Kshs. 2,800,000 was upheld as proper compensation based on the valuation evidence and restitution pri…

  • Privity of contract
  • Fraud
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Restitutio in integrum
  • Liability for misrepresentation
  • Joint and several liability
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 5136 (KLR)

Mwithiga (Suing as the Representative of the Estate of the Late M’Mwithiga M’Rware alias M’Mwithiga M’Irwawe) v M’Twerandu & another

Mwithiga (Suing as the Representative of the Estate of the Late M’Mwithiga M’Rware alias M’Mwithiga M’Irwawe) v M’Twerandu & another (Environment and Land Appeal E057 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 5136 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Judgment)

The appellant proved that the suit property remained part of the deceased’s estate, that the alleged succession cause was non-existent, and that the transfer to Priscillah Ntinyari Ndubi and onward to the respondents was illegal and an act of intermeddling done without lawful capacity or a grant of administration. The trial court erred by acknowledging the illegality yet failing to grant consequential relief and by issuing an impermissible order purporting to regularize a void transaction. Because an illegal transfer cannot be validated by the court, the appellate court set aside the part of…

  • Illegal transfer of deceased person's land
  • Intermeddling with estate
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Nullity ab initio
  • Rectification of register
  • Cancellation of title
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4805 (KLR)

Ole Sile & another v Onsembe & another (Land Case (Originating Summons) E015 of 2024)

Ole Sile & another v Onsembe & another (Land Case (Originating Summons) E015 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 4805 (KLR) (27 July 2026) (Ruling)

The court held that Crasoft Systems Limited demonstrated a proximate interest in the suit property through the sale agreement and alleged ownership stake, and because the adverse possession claim could affect that interest, non-joinder could prejudice the applicant and create multiplicity of suits. The application met the threshold for joinder as an interested party and was allowed with costs in the cause.

  • Joinder of interested party
  • Proximate and protectable interest
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Status quo orders
  • Multiplicity of suits
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4655 (KLR)

Kamau & another v Mururi (Administrator of the Estate of Julia Waithira Karatu) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2022)

Kamau & another v Mururi (Administrator of the Estate of Julia Waithira Karatu) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 4655 (KLR) (20 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Plaintiffs failed to prove a valid and complete sale of the suit land, failed to prove payment of the alleged balance or a lawful basis for specific performance, and failed to establish the essential elements of adverse possession because entry, permission, and the commencement and running of time were not clearly proved. The succession proceedings did not bar the claim, but the substantive evidence was inadequate. The suit therefore lacked merit and was dismissed with costs. The Plaintiffs were ordered to vacate the land within 60 days.

  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Specific performance
  • Adverse possession
  • Limitation period for contract claims
  • Fraud pleading and proof
  • Interplay between succession and land jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4527 (KLR)

Mbichire v Mwangi & 3 others

Mbichire v Mwangi & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal E072 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4527 (KLR) (16 July 2026) (Judgment)

The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving that the 1st respondent obtained sole registration of the suit property through fraud, forgery, misrepresentation or any other unlawful means. PW1 was not privy to the disputed transaction, the appellant did not testify to rebut the transfer narrative, no forged instruments or procedural irregularity were proved, and the land registrar found no irregularity. Because the 1st respondent's title was not impeached, the appeal against the subsequent transfer and charge had no foundation.

  • Fraud in land transfer
  • Burden and standard of proof
  • Indefeasibility of title
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Charge over land
  • Cancellation of title
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4446 (KLR)

Mwangi v Mwangi & 2 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E033 of 2025)

Mwangi v Mwangi & 2 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E033 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4446 (KLR) (15 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Applicant proved that he had occupied the suit land openly, peacefully, and without permission for nearly 40 years, well beyond the 12-year statutory period, and the earlier matter was not res judicata because the forum that heard it lacked jurisdiction over adverse possession. Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd remained a necessary party because it had not discharged the charge and had delayed registration, so judgment was entered for the Applicant.

  • Adverse possession
  • Res judicata
  • Jurisdiction of magistrates' courts
  • Transfer of registered land
  • Discharge of charge
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4550 (KLR)

Kanguru v Nkuene & another (Appeal E028 of 2025)

Kanguru v Nkuene & another (Appeal E028 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4550 (KLR) (9 July 2026) (Judgment)

The 1st respondent’s claim depended on a sale agreement over property of a deceased person, but the vendor had no demonstrated legal capacity and no grant of representation had been produced; the transaction was therefore illegal and void. Because the root of the 1st respondent’s title was tainted with illegality, the doctrine of bona fide purchaser for value could not validate it. By contrast, the appellant produced credible, uncontroverted evidence showing her prior entitlement. The trial court misapplied the burden of proof and wrongly rejected the appellant’s evidence, so the judgment had…

  • Intermeddling with deceased’s property
  • Capacity to contract over estate property
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • First appellate court re-evaluation of evidence
  • Burden and standard of proof
  • Root of title
Read case analysis
Succession law [2026] KEMC 266 (KLR)

In re Estate of Eroni (Deceased)

In re Estate of Eroni (Deceased) (Succession Cause E004 of 2025) [2026] KEMC 266 (KLR) (8 July 2026) (Ruling)

The application failed because the applicants’ claim depended on a disputed question of land ownership and proprietary interest, which the succession court had no jurisdiction to determine. Since the alleged purchaser’s interest had not been established before a court of competent jurisdiction, there was no basis to revoke or rectify the grant on that account.

  • Revocation of grant
  • Rectification of certificate of grant
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Section 93 law of succession act
  • Jurisdiction over ownership disputes
  • Estate property identification
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4640 (KLR)

Taruru v Muniko & another

Taruru v Muniko & another (Environment and Land Case 757 of 2017) [2026] KEELC 4640 (KLR) (8 July 2026) (Judgment)

The suit had abated automatically one year after the plaintiff’s death because no valid substitution or extension of time was obtained, and the later amendments were unlawful nullities. Even if the suit were alive, the Plaintiff failed to prove adverse possession: the evidence pointed to permissive occupation under a tenancy/renovation arrangement, the alleged sale agreement was unreliable, no survey evidence identified the precise portion claimed, and the occupation was not proven to be hostile or continuous for the required statutory period. The 2nd Defendant was found to have purchased the…

  • Abatement of suit on death of plaintiff
  • Validity of amendments after abatement
  • Certified extract of title under order 37 rule 7
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • Permissive occupation versus hostile possession
  • Proof of adverse possession over registered land
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 4208 (KLR)

Githaiga v Kibelenge & 6 others

Githaiga v Kibelenge & 6 others (Environment and Land Civil Appeal E020 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4208 (KLR) (1 July 2026) (Judgment)

The appeal failed because the appellant did not discharge the burden of proving forgery or illegality in the contested sale transaction, and the evidence supported the trial court's finding that the land interests had been genuinely transferred by beneficiaries or persons treated as entitled to those portions. The court held that the purchasers' occupation and transactions created protectable equitable interests, specifically a constructive trust, and that the resulting titles should not be disturbed. The proper course was to account for those purchasers' interests in the pending succession p…

  • Intermeddling with estate property
  • Fraudulent subdivision and transfer of land
  • Constructive trust
  • Bona fide purchaser for value
  • First appellate re-evaluation of evidence
  • Cancellation/rectification of land register
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.