Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kasanduku v Chege (Appeal E227 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 2436 (KLR) (31 August 2026) (Judgment)
The Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed the appeal because the Record of Appeal omitted the trial judgment and decree, making the appeal incompetent.
Car Wash Den Limited (Suing Through One of the Directors Samuel Kimani Karanja) v Njoroge & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3344 (KLR) (28 May 2026) (Ruling)
The appellant failed to file and serve the record of appeal despite repeated opportunities and adjournments, and the court found the appellant unwilling to prosecute the appeal; the appeal was therefore dismissed under Order 42 rule 35 with costs.
Source excerpt
Middle Management Services v Ochieng (Appeal E062 of 2024) [2026] KEELRC 1303 (KLR) (18 May 2026) (Ruling)
The appeal was filed far outside the statutory and procedural timelines, and the appellant took no effective steps under the ELRC Rules to regularize time, file the record of appeal, or otherwise prosecute the matter; the explanation of pending proceedings did not excuse complete inaction, so dismissal for want of prosecution was warranted.
Source excerpt
Otsyula v Abdulali Shariff Jiraj & Sons Limited & another (Civil Appeal E020 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 7740 (KLR) (11 May 2026) (Ruling)
The court found, on the basis of the affidavit of service dated 13/3/2026, that the appellant had been duly served and was aware of the hearing date; because there was no appearance or response, the court held that the appeal had been abandoned and dismissed it for want of prosecution with costs.
Source excerpt
Kute v Oyieyo (Miscellaneous Application E009 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 2790 (KLR) (7 May 2026) (Ruling)
The Court held that the Applicant failed to prove that the deposit of Kshs. 200,000 had become refundable to him, and since the appeal allegedly failed and liabilities for costs and the decretal sum remained unsettled, the security had to remain available to satisfy the Respondent’s lawful entitlements.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed Phylip O. Mwabe’s appeal from an election petition decision and ordered each party to bear its own costs.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with costs, relying on the reasons stated in Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1997.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Bamburi Portland Cement Company Limited’s appeal with costs, agreeing with the reasoning of the High Court and finding no basis to interfere.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant’s civil appeal with costs, agreeing with the draft judgment and finding no basis to interfere with the High Court decision.
Explore more
