Esheria Kenya Case Law
Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter Kenya case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2026] KEHC 12291 (KLR)

NM v IMN

NM v IMN (Civil Suit 5 of 2016) [2026] KEHC 12291 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Ruling)

Court
High Court
Case number
Civil Suit 5 of 2016
Judge
["JK Sergon"]

The court found that the 5 October 2022 order was clear, the respondent knew of it, and the evidence showed she personally collected rent and controlled the accounting process without seeking variation or discharge of the order. The court therefore held that she wilfully disobeyed the order and was guilty of contempt. The earlier 2023 application did not bar the present motion because it concerned a different issue and the present motion relied on new evidence. The court also held that it had jurisdiction to issue enforcement injunctions because the orders sought were aimed at compelling comp…

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Stay of execution pending appeal
  • Violation of court orders
  • Res judicata
  • Injunctive relief
  • Court-appointed rent collection agent
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 12457 (KLR)

EWN v INK

EWN v INK (Matrimonial Property Cause (OS) E002 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 12457 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Ruling)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Property Cause (OS) E002 of 2025
Judge
["EN Maina"]

The court found that both the interlocutory application and the originating summons were filed almost six years after the decree absolute, far outside the 12-month period mandated by Rule 5(2) of the Matrimonial Property Rules, 2022, and no leave or regularisation was sought after the defect was raised; as a result, the matter was time-barred and struck out with costs, making the injunction request untenable.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Interlocutory injunction
  • Limitation/time bar under matrimonial property rules
  • Contribution to matrimonial property
  • Post-divorce property claims
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 11729 (KLR)

Majani v Luvayo

Majani v Luvayo (Matrimonial Cause E001 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 11729 (KLR) (28 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E001 of 2024
Judge
["RN Nyakundi"]

The Applicant remained entitled to bring the claim after divorce. The land, being the matrimonial home acquired during marriage and registered in the Respondent's name, was matrimonial property and subject to the statutory presumption of trust under section 14, which the Respondent failed to rebut. The Applicant proved substantial monetary and non-monetary contribution, justifying an equal share. The vehicle claim failed because ownership, acquisition, and contribution were not proved beyond photographs.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Contribution (monetary and non-monetary)
  • Matrimonial home
  • Constructive trust
  • Statutory presumption of trust
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 11495 (KLR)

TO v JT

TO v JT (Matrimonial Cause E058 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 11495 (KLR) (Family) (23 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E058 of 2023
Judge
["EKO Ogola"]

The court held that the Mavoko matrimonial home was jointly owned in equal shares because it was registered in both parties' names, while the Respondent's evidence and the Applicant's refusal to cooperate with bank disclosure justified adverse inference that most remaining disputed assets were funded by joint marital efforts. The court accepted that non-monetary contributions count in matrimonial property division, rejected the Applicant's attempt to use a parenting arrangement to evict the Respondent, and distributed the estate by excluding pre-marital and proven ancestral/inheritance proper…

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Presumption of trust and equal ownership
  • Customary/ancestral trust
  • Adverse inference for suppressed evidence
  • Non-monetary spousal contribution
  • Eviction from matrimonial home
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 10701 (KLR)

Wanjara v Metuo & another

Wanjara v Metuo & another (Matrimonial Case E018 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 10701 (KLR) (Family) (16 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Case E018 of 2022
Judge
["HK Chemitei"]

The Court found that both parties proved substantial contributions, financial and non-financial, to the acquisition and development of the matrimonial property. The Plaintiff failed to prove an 80% interest. On the evidence, the Court held that the equitable and fair division was equal, and declared the property matrimonial property to be shared 50:50.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Contribution to acquisition and development
  • Non-monetary contribution
  • Presumption of trust
  • Valuation and sale of matrimonial property
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 11218 (KLR)

Mwangi v Thande (Family Originating Summons 10A of 2008)

Mwangi v Thande (Family Originating Summons 10A of 2008) [2026] KEHC 11218 (KLR) (Family) (14 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Family Originating Summons 10A of 2008
Judge
["CJ Kendagor"]

The suit property, although gifted and registered in the Respondent’s name, was occupied and used as the parties’ matrimonial home after their traditional marriage and therefore constituted matrimonial property. The Applicant did not prove direct financial contribution, but the Court found substantial indirect contribution through companionship, childcare, preservation, and management of the property. Equity required equal sharing, so the property was divided 50:50.

Source excerpt

  • Matrimonial home
  • Indirect contribution
  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Gift property
  • Retrospective application of article 45(3) constitution
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 10442 (KLR)

JLG v SKM

JLG v SKM (Matrimonial Cause E016 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 10442 (KLR) (10 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E016 of 2022
Judge
["A Mshila"]

The court found that both disputed properties were acquired during the pendency of the marriage/cohabitation and therefore constituted matrimonial property. Although the Applicant did not prove direct monetary contribution, she proved indirect non-monetary contribution through family support and management of the household/business. The court therefore awarded her a 30% share in each property and the Respondent 70%.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Cohabitation and customary marriage
  • Non-monetary contribution
  • Beneficial interest
  • Presumption of trust
  • Property acquired during marriage
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 10499 (KLR)

SWN v GN

SWN v GN (Matrimonial Cause E020 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 10499 (KLR) (8 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E020 of 2024
Judge
["JM Nang'ea"]

The property was purchased by the Respondent in 2003 before the parties’ marriage was proved to have subsisted, so it did not qualify as matrimonial property acquired during marriage. The Applicant failed to prove direct financial contribution to acquisition, and the loan relied on was not shown to have funded the purchase. However, the court accepted that she made indirect contribution through childcare, companionship, and support after acquisition, warranting a limited beneficial share. Accordingly, she was awarded 20% of the property rather than an equal division.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Contribution to acquisition of property
  • Pre-marital acquisition
  • Indirect contribution
  • Matters of cohabitation and marriage
  • Valuation and buy-out of matrimonial property
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 9511 (KLR)

MMAO v ROO

MMAO v ROO (Matrimonial Cause E003 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 9511 (KLR) (Family) (3 July 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E003 of 2023
Judge
["H Namisi"]

The apartment was matrimonial property acquired during marriage and registered in both parties' names, triggering the statutory presumption of equal beneficial interests. The applicant failed to prove that her financial contributions, though substantial, extinguished the respondent's non-monetary contributions. The respondent's 14 years of primary childcare, household management, and management of local family affairs were legally significant contributions. On the totality of evidence, equity required a 50:50 division.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Joint registration presumption
  • Monetary and non-monetary contribution
  • Matrimonial home
  • Equitable distribution
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] KEHC 9105 (KLR)

BMW v SWW

BMW v SWW (Matrimonial Cause E003 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 9105 (KLR) (26 June 2026) (Judgment)

Court
High Court
Case number
Matrimonial Cause E003 of 2023
Judge
["A Mshila"]

Karai/Karai/6436 was acquired during the marriage and is therefore matrimonial property, but the evidence showed the Respondent made the larger contribution to its acquisition and development. The Applicant proved some contribution, mainly indirect and household-related, but not enough to justify parity. The proper division was 40:60 in favour of the Respondent.

Source excerpt

  • Division of matrimonial property
  • Contribution-based ownership
  • Presumption of trust
  • Non-monetary contribution
  • Matrimonial home
  • Dissolution of marriage
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.