Komu v Directline Assurance Company Ltd
Komu v Directline Assurance Company Ltd (Commercial Case E474 of 2025) [2026] SCC 81 (KLR) (8 May 2026) (Ruling)
The applicant failed to prove financial hardship, but the court nevertheless exercised its discretion under section 36(1)(a) of the Small Claims Court Act to allow payment by instalments in the interests of justice, fixing terms that were more substantial than requested to balance the parties’ interests.
Source excerpt
- Payment of decretal sum by instalments
- Judicial discretion
- Enforcement of judgment debt
- Financial hardship
- Execution on default