Ondieki alias Matigirisi v Republic
Ondieki alias Matigirisi v Republic (Criminal Appeal E015 of 2022) [2026] KECA 1408 (KLR) (10 July 2026) (Judgment)
The conviction was proper because the appellant was the last person seen with the deceased and the circumstantial evidence was overwhelming: the deceased's slippers and bloodstained items linked by DNA to the deceased were recovered from the appellant's house, and the deceased died by manual strangulation, a mode of killing consistent with malice aforethought. The sentence was lawful and fit the offence, but it had to run from the date the appellant was first produced in court to account for pre-sentence custody.
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Circumstantial evidence
- Last seen doctrine
- Malice aforethought
- Dna evidence
- Recovery of exhibits