Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal-law [2026] KEHC 13468 (KLR)

Kahindi v Republic

The High Court dismissed an appeal against convictions for dealing in and possessing elephant tusks, holding the prosecution proved the Wildlife Act offences.

  • Dealing-in-wildlife-trophy
  • Possession-of-endangered-species-trophy
  • First-appeal-re-evaluation-of-evidence
  • Sentencing-under-the-wildlife-conservation-and-management-act
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Inventory-and-chain-of-custody
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2026] KEMC 875 (KLR)

Republic v Claudine Amoo Omukaga

The accused was acquitted of housebreaking after the court found a material variance between the charge and the evidence, and insufficient proof of breaking or intent.

  • Housebreaking
  • Burglary-distinction
  • Defective-charge-sheet
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Intent-to-commit-a-felony
  • Variance-between-charge-and-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2026] KEMC 874 (KLR)

Republic v John Paul Otieno

The court acquitted John Paul Otieno of breaking into a shop and handling stolen property, finding the prosecution had not proved breaking or linked him to the specific phone beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Breaking-into-a-building-and-committing-a-felony
  • Handling-stolen-property
  • Doctrine-of-recent-possession
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Admissibility-of-confessions/admissions
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2026] KEHC 13289 (KLR)

Republic v Wafula & another

Republic v Wafula & another (Criminal Case 1034 of 2020) [2026] KEHC 13289 (KLR) (2 September 2026) (Judgment)

The court acquitted accused 2 and 3 on all counts after finding the prosecution had not proved housebreaking, stealing, or malicious damage beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Housebreaking
  • Stealing
  • Malicious-damage-to-property
  • Alibi-defence
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Trial-in-absentia
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 10307 (KLR)

Kabayo v Republic

Kabayo v Republic [2025] KEHC 10307 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against a defilement conviction, upheld the 20-year sentence, and ordered credit for time spent in custody.

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Identification-evidence
  • Sentencing-principles
  • Remand-period-credit
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 10308 (KLR)

Obanda v Republic

Obanda v Republic [2025] KEHC 10308 (KLR)

High Court dismissed a defilement appeal, upheld conviction and 15-year sentence, and directed that pre-sentence custody time be counted under section 333(2).

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Voir-dire-examination
  • Sentencing-principles
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Identification-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 9857 (KLR)

Pelele v Republic

Pelele v Republic [2025] KEHC 9857 (KLR)

The High Court allowed an appeal against a defilement conviction, finding material contradictions in the evidence and insufficient proof of recent penetration.

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Contradictory-evidence
  • Medical-evidence
  • Credibility-of-witnesses
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 9069 (KLR)

Koros v Republic

Koros v Republic [2025] KEHC 9069 (KLR)

High Court allowed a defilement appeal, finding the prosecution failed to prove penetration beyond reasonable doubt and set aside the conviction and sentence.

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Standard-of-proof
  • Corroboration
  • Evidence-of-single-witness
  • Criminal-appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 8985 (KLR)

MOI v Republic

MOI v Republic [2025] KEHC 8985 (KLR)

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal for defilement, holding that penetration was not proved beyond reasonable doubt and the conviction was unsafe.

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Standard-of-proof
  • Credibility-of-witnesses
  • Corroboration
  • Mental-capacity
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] KEHC 7105 (KLR)

Ombima v Republic

Ombima v Republic [2025] KEHC 7105 (KLR)

High Court appeal in a defilement conviction. The court upheld conviction and 15-year sentence, but ordered time spent in custody to be counted under section 333(2).

  • Defilement
  • Sexual-offences-act
  • Sentencing-principles
  • Proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
  • Criminal-appeals
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.