Pink Pearl Investments Ltd v Esteel Construction Ltd
Pink Pearl Investments Ltd v Esteel Construction Ltd (Commercial Miscellaneous Application E805 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 12218 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (31 July 2026) (Ruling)
The application for review failed because the alleged omission of paragraph 24 did not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record: paragraph 24 was part of the Court's reasoning explaining the limits of its jurisdiction, not an operative order, and the Court had in fact considered the relevant contractual and arbitral materials. The complaints amounted to disagreement with the breadth or adequacy of the earlier reasoning, which is a matter for appeal, not review.
Source excerpt
- Review under order 45
- Finality of high court decision under section 17(6) of the arbitration act
- Error apparent on the face of the record
- Extracted orders versus ratio decidendi
- Arbitrability and arbitral jurisdiction
- Article 159(2)(d) technical defects