Kenya Case Law

Muriithi v Republic

Muriithi v Republic [2025] KECA 1244 (KLR)

Court

Court of Appeal

Case number

Criminal Appeal 119 of 2018

Judges

W Karanja, J Mohammed, AO Muchelule

The Court of Appeal found that the prosecution proved all elements of the offence of murder beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence of multiple eyewitnesses established that the appellant assaulted the deceased by slapping, kicking, and fatally striking her head with a stone, actions that were unprovoked and demonstrated malice aforethought as defined under section 206 of the Penal Code. The appellant's defence was found to be a fabrication and inconsistent with the medical and eyewitness evidence. On sentence, while the trial court was justified in imposing a severe penalty given the brutality…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Malice Aforethought
• Sentencing Guidelines
• Appeals On Sentence
• Actus Reus
• Mens Rea

Republic v Wanjiku

Republic v Wanjiku [2025] KEHC 9817 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 23 of 2020

Judge

K Kimondo

The High Court held that circumstantial evidence did not establish a prima facie murder case, and acquitted Victor Macharia Wanjiku under section 306(1).

• Murder
• Circumstantial Evidence
• Standard Of Proof
• Actus Reus
• Malice Aforethought
• Circumstantial-evidence

Republic v Mutungwa

Republic v Mutungwa [2025] KEHC 10181 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 127 of 2017

Judge

TM Matheka

The court found that while the deceased died from head injuries caused by blunt force trauma, the only credible eyewitness testimony established that Francis Kongu, who is at large, was the person who assaulted the deceased. The accused was seen attempting to separate the fight and not participating in the assault. The prosecution's case was undermined by inconsistencies and lack of direct evidence implicating the accused. The dying declarations were not sufficiently corroborated to support a conviction. The defence's account was corroborated by the eyewitness, raising reasonable doubt as to…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Burden Of Proof
• Dying Declaration
• Actus Reus
• Mens Rea

Republic v Kivaru

Republic v Kivaru [2025] KEHC 9364 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 31 of 2018

Judge

RK Limo

The court found that while the fact and cause of death were established, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased. The testimonies of key prosecution witnesses were inconsistent, particularly regarding the accused's conduct after the incident and the movement of the body. The accused's steadfast denial, the suspicious conduct of PW2's family in moving the body and tying the accused, and the lack of evidence of motive or malice aforethought created significant doubt. The court held that in criminal cases, any doubt mus…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Actus Reus
• Mens Rea
• Burden Of Proof
• Evidence Evaluation

Republic v Njogu

Republic v Njogu [2025] KEHC 9201 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case E014 of 2022

Judge

LN Mutende

The court found that the prosecution had adduced evidence, including eyewitness testimony and corroborative accounts, that placed the accused at the scene, established his involvement in the events leading to the deceased's death, and confirmed the cause of death through medical evidence. The evidence went beyond mere suspicion and, if unchallenged, could support a conviction. Therefore, the prosecution established a prima facie case, and the accused must be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Prima Facie Case
• Burden Of Proof
• Actus Reus
• Mens Rea

Republic v Macharia

Republic v Macharia [2025] KEHC 9294 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case E032 of 2021

Judge

MW Muigai

The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, Stanley Macharia Mwangi, unlawfully caused the death of the deceased by stabbing him during a dispute. Eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence placed the accused at the scene with the murder weapon and confirmed the cause of death as a stab wound. However, the court determined that the prosecution failed to establish malice aforethought as required for a murder conviction. There was no evidence of premeditation, planning, or intent to kill or cause grievous harm; rather, the fatal incident arose from a sp…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Manslaughter
• Malice Aforethought
• Burden Of Proof
• Standard Of Proof
• Actus Reus

Republic v Barasa

Republic v Barasa [2025] KEHC 8779 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 36 of 2019

Judge

AC Mrima

The court found that the prosecution proved all elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt. The fact of death and its cause were established by the post mortem report and corroborated by eyewitnesses. The accused's actions—hitting the deceased with a jembe and cutting him with a panga—were directly witnessed by PW1, PW2, and PW6, whose testimonies were consistent and credible. The defence of alibi was not corroborated and was contradicted by the accused's own witnesses, who did not confirm his absence from the scene. The alleged land dispute and prior hostilities did not create reasonable dou…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Malice Aforethought
• Actus Reus
• Defence Of Alibi
• Eyewitness Testimony
• Burden Of Proof

Republic v Manyara

Republic v Manyara [2025] KEHC 8703 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 66 of 2013

Judge

JRA Wananda

The court found that while the prosecution proved the death of the deceased and that it was caused by a stab wound, it failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the person who inflicted the fatal injury. The evidence relied upon was largely circumstantial, with no witness having seen the accused stab the deceased or possess the murder weapon. The testimonies indicated that the accused and deceased were involved in a fight, but at the time they were separated, the deceased showed no visible injuries and was later found dead in circumstances that could not be explained by any…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Actus Reus
• Malice Aforethought
• Circumstantial Evidence
• Burden Of Proof
• Acquittal

Republic v Maina

Republic v Maina [2025] KEHC 8006 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 5 of 2019

Judge

RK Limo

The court found that the prosecution had established all elements of the offence of murder beyond reasonable doubt. The cause of death was strangulation, as confirmed by medical evidence. The accused was the only person present with the deceased at the material time, and circumstantial evidence, including the recovery and forensic analysis of blood-stained clothes, linked him directly to the crime. The accused's prior conduct towards the deceased, including violence and financial disputes, further supported the inference of malice aforethought. The accused's demeanor after the incident and hi…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Circumstantial Evidence
• Actus Reus
• Mens Rea
• Malice Aforethought
• Forensic Evidence

Republic v Bett

Republic v Bett [2025] KEHC 6345 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Case 41 of 2017

Judge

PN Gichohi

The High Court at Nakuru found no prima facie case in a murder charge, holding that the prosecution failed to link the accused to the deceased’s death.

• Murder
• Prima Facie Case
• Actus Reus
• Malice Aforethought
• Acquittal
• Criminal Procedure