Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 10512 (KLR)

Hussein v Republic

Hussein v Republic [2025] KEHC 10512 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having served part of his sentence, demonstrated remorse, rehabilitation, and readiness for reintegration as evidenced by the social inquiry report. The complainant's forgiveness and lack of opposition to early release, combined with the applicant's positive conduct and family support, justified a shift from a custodial to a non-custodial sentence. The court emphasized the need for proportionality in sentencing and the appropriateness of community-based rehabilitation over continued imprisonment in this case. Consequently, the remainder of the sentence was…

  • Sentencing Policy
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Non Custodial Sentences
  • Rehabilitation Of Offenders
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 10088 (KLR)

Aruya v Republic

Aruya v Republic [2025] KEHC 10088 (KLR)

The court found that the alleged defect in the charge sheet did not occasion any prejudice to the appellant, as he understood the nature of the charges and was able to defend himself. The evidence of the complainant was consistent, credible, and corroborated by medical and other prosecution witnesses, establishing the elements of both committing an indecent act with a child and assault causing actual bodily harm. The appellant's defence was a mere denial and did not discredit the prosecution's case. The trial court properly convicted the appellant on both counts, and the sentences imposed wer…

  • Sexual Offences
  • Indecent Act With Child
  • Defective Charge Sheet
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Evidence Evaluation
  • Sentencing Principles
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 9252 (KLR)

Munyua & another v Republic

Munyua & another v Republic [2025] KEHC 9252 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against convictions for creating disturbance and assault causing actual bodily harm arising from a land dispute.

  • Creating Disturbance
  • Breach Of Peace
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Breach-of-peace
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 9555 (KLR)

Nguu v Republic

Nguu v Republic [2025] KEHC 9555 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal, upholding convictions for robbery with violence and assault, and affirming the trial court’s sentences.

  • Robbery With Violence
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Doctrine Of Recent Possession
  • Identification Evidence
  • Joinder Of Offences
  • Robbery-with-violence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 8979 (KLR)

Abdi v Republic

Abdi v Republic [2025] KEHC 8979 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had proved all the essential elements of the offence of defilement beyond reasonable doubt. The age of the complainant was established at 14 years through oral and documentary evidence. Penetration was corroborated by both the complainant's testimony and medical evidence. Although the identification parade was irregular and improperly conducted, the court held that there was sufficient evidence of recognition and positive identification by the complainant and other witnesses, including immediate post-offence identification and corroboration by the appellan…

  • Sexual Offences
  • Defilement
  • Identification Evidence
  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 8603 (KLR)

Republic v Okumu & another

Republic v Okumu & another [2025] KEHC 8603 (KLR)

High Court allowed the State’s appeal, set aside an acquittal, and convicted the two respondents for assault causing actual bodily harm.

  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Medical Evidence
  • Identification Of Accused
  • Assault-causing-actual-bodily-harm
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 7801 (KLR)

Mataiyan v Republic

Mataiyan v Republic [2025] KEHC 7801 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had adduced credible and corroborated evidence establishing that the appellant unlawfully inflicted grievous harm on PW1, assaulted PW2, and maliciously damaged PW2's vehicle. Medical reports and P3 forms confirmed the severity and permanence of PW1's injuries, consistent with grievous harm. Eyewitness testimony from both complainants identified the appellant as the perpetrator, and the appellant's own admissions placed her at the scene and acknowledged striking PW2 and damaging the vehicle. The trial court's findings were supported by the evidence, and th…

  • Grievous Harm
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Malicious Damage To Property
  • Criminal Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 7009 (KLR)

Republic v Langat & another

Republic v Langat & another [2025] KEHC 7009 (KLR)

The High Court reviewed a conviction and one-year sentence for assault causing actual bodily harm and found no basis to interfere, dismissing the revision.

  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Revision Jurisdiction
  • Criminal-revision
  • Assault-causing-actual-bodily-harm
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 7010 (KLR)

Republic v Keino

Republic v Keino [2025] KEHC 7010 (KLR)

The High Court revised a subordinate court’s default sentence, reducing it from 12 months to 7 months and ordering the applicant’s release unless otherwise lawfully held.

  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Malicious Damage To Property
  • Sentencing Revision
  • Default Sentences
  • Supervisory Jurisdiction
  • Criminal-revision
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] KEHC 5327 (KLR)

Ngeno v Republic

Ngeno v Republic [2025] KEHC 5327 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant, acting with another, robbed the complainants while armed and using violence, abducted one victim with intent to confine, and assaulted another causing actual bodily harm. The identification evidence was strong, based on recognition by persons known to the appellant, and corroborated by recovery of stolen property and physical evidence. The appellant's defence was found to be an afterthought, unsupported by cross-examination or evidence, and did not cast doubt on the prosecution's case. On sentencing, the c…

  • Robbery With Violence
  • Abduction With Intent To Confine
  • Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Identification Evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.