High Court family appeal on child maintenance and custody dismissed after the court upheld a monthly maintenance order and found no basis to interfere.
The High Court declined to stay a Children’s Court order releasing part of the appellant’s pension for the children’s education, finding no basis to suspend maintenance.
MPL. (Suing As the Mother Andnext friend Of L.L.L. – A Minor) v LL [2025] KEMC 162 (KLR)
Court
Magistrate's Court
Case number
Children's Case E002 of 2025
Judge
AT Sitati
The court found the parental responsibility agreement was not binding, ordered joint custody, and split monthly maintenance equally between the parents.
TMM (Suing as father and next friend of the Minors TMM & TKM) v FGK [2025] KEHC 10577 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Civil Appeal 327 of 2023
Judge
RC Rutto
The High Court declined interim orders for equal parental contribution to minors’ education costs, remitting the matter to the trial court for reassessment after changed circumstances.
The High Court dismissed an appeal over alleged child maintenance arrears, holding that the appellant had not proved full payment on a balance of probabilities.
The court found that the appeal had not been prosecuted for over two years without sufficient cause, constituting inordinate and inexcusable delay. Such delay prejudices the welfare and best interests of the child, which are of paramount importance under the Constitution and the Children Act. The court emphasized that both parents have a legal obligation to provide for the child, and the continued pendency of the appeal would unjustly delay the child's enjoyment of rights to maintenance and care. The court concluded that justice required dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution, allowi…
The court found that the applicant failed to satisfy the requirements for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant's assertions of substantial loss were centered on his own interests, such as reputational harm and personal inconvenience, rather than the welfare of the minors. The court emphasized that in children matters, the best interests of the child are paramount and override the interests of the parents. The applicant did not demonstrate that the minors would suffer substantial loss if stay was not granted, nor di…
High Court partly allowed a children’s appeal, confirming actual custody with the mother, joint legal custody, and monthly maintenance, while setting aside a fixed school-fee award.
The High Court at Busia granted an unopposed application compelling the respondent to meet the minors’ educational needs and submit to DNA testing to determine paternity.
The High Court found that the Kadhi's Court had jurisdiction to determine issues of child custody and maintenance where both parties are Muslim and have submitted to its authority, as such matters are incidental to marriage and divorce. The Appellant failed to provide evidence of his financial inability to pay the amounts ordered, and the trial court was entitled to make maintenance orders based on the best interests of the children. The court held that the divorce was judicial, not khul'u, as the grounds for dissolution were proven and the Appellant did not consent to khul'u. Therefore, the…