Gathinji v Republic
Gathinji v Republic [2025] KEHC 9819 (KLR)
The High Court found that the offences of burglary and attempted arson were committed at the same time, place, and as part of a single transaction. Applying established legal principles and relevant statutory provisions, the court held that the sentences should run concurrently rather than consecutively. The court also considered the statutory maximum sentences for each offence and determined that the original sentences imposed by the trial court were within the law but required adjustment to reflect the concurrent nature of the offences. The period spent in custody was also to be taken into…
Source excerpt
- Sentencing Principles
- Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentences
- Burglary
- Attempted Arson