Director of Public Prosecution v Ndula & 8 others
Director of Public Prosecution v Ndula & 8 others [2025] KEHC 10609 (KLR)
The court found that while the prosecution's omission to disclose additional witness statements at the pre-trial stage was due to inadvertence and reflected indolence, this did not, in itself, justify denying the application to introduce further evidence. The court emphasized that disclosure is a continuous process during trial, as long as the prosecution's case is not closed, and that the defence must be given sufficient time to study and respond to new evidence. The court also noted that the respondents failed to provide evidence of a binding consent barring further applications for additio…
Source excerpt
- Disclosure Of Evidence
- Fair Trial Rights
- Procedural Justice
- Revision Jurisdiction