Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Nyasinga v Metropolitan National Sacco Society Ltd [2025] KECPT 376 (KLR)
The Cooperative Tribunal awarded a former Sacco member Kshs. 88,038.28 as refund of savings, plus costs and interest, but dismissed the claim for dividends.
Oburu v Transcom Cooperative & Credit Society Limited [2025] KECPT 350 (KLR)
The Tribunal found the claimant proved membership in the sacco and ordered refund of Kshs. 252,050, plus costs and interest. Claims for dividends and nominal damages failed.
Muturi v Kencom Sacco Society Limited [2025] KECPT 345 (KLR)
The Cooperative Tribunal ordered Kencom Sacco to refund a former member Kshs. 380,245.98, with interest and costs, after finding the claim unchallenged.
Kamau v Kenya Qatar Diaspora Savings and Credit Society [2024] KECPT 1717 (KLR)
The Tribunal partly allowed a member’s claim against a savings and credit society, ordering repayment of Kshs. 830,500 and an account of taxi business income, but dismissing dividends and vehicle replacement claims.
Medidingi v Metropolitan Sacco [2024] KECPT 916 (KLR)
The Cooperative Tribunal awarded a Sacco member Kshs. 483,897.82, holding that she had proved withdrawal and entitlement to refund, while the Sacco offered no evidence of AGM resolutions.
Nyambura v Cosmos Sacco Limited [2024] KECPT 936 (KLR)
The Cooperative Tribunal ordered Cosmos Sacco to refund a withdrawing member’s savings and pay dividends, finding no proven ongoing guarantor liability.
Njoki v Metropolitan Sacco [2024] KECPT 895 (KLR)
The Cooperative Tribunal awarded Beth Njoki Kshs. 526,590 against Metropolitan Sacco for shares and dividends, rejecting the Sacco’s unsupported delay defence.
Kiema v NHIF Sacco Society Ltd [2024] KECPT 217 (KLR)
The tribunal found that the claimant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including pay slips and a withdrawal letter, to prove her membership, the amount of deposits, and the absence of liabilities. The respondent admitted membership but failed to disprove the claimed amount or provide evidence of any outstanding liabilities. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a refund of KES 404,000 as share deposits. However, the claimant failed to provide evidence of declared dividends for the years 2018 to 2022, and the respondent's balance sheets did not show any dividends paya…
Source excerpt
Oloo (Suing as Representative of Over 2000 Retirees of Kenya Railways and Members of Reli Sacco) v Reli Sacco Cooperative Society Limited & another [2023] KECPT 1058 (KLR)
The Tribunal dismissed a retirees’ claim against Reli Sacco for dividends, interest, and refunds, finding no proof that dividends were declared during the relevant years.
Chege v MTN Sacco Society Ltd [2023] KECPT 764 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was suspended, not expelled, in October 2019, and that the suspension was unprocedural as it did not comply with the by-laws requiring a 30-day notice and opportunity to defend. The Claimant remained a member until his resignation in January 2020. Upon cessation, the by-laws entitled him to a refund of shares, deposits, and any dividends or interests due prior to cessation. The Tribunal determined that the Claimant was paid his dues except for the 2019 dividend and interest, which he was entitled to at the rate of 9%. The claim for refund of Kshs. 45,000 f…
Source excerpt
Explore more
