The court found that the search of the appellants' residence was lawful as both statutory exceptions and the appellants' voluntary consent justified the absence of a warrant. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants were in possession of government trophies and counterfeit currency, as the items were found in rooms under their control and no credible evidence was adduced to show otherwise. The trial court properly admitted the document examiner's report through another officer, as permitted by law. The court held that the trial court correctly analyzed the evidence,…