Musungu v Spreadmarketing Consulting Agency Limited [2025] KEELRC 2108 (KLR)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
Employment and Labour Relations Cause E020 of 2025
Judge
AN Mwaure
The court dismissed a preliminary objection that the employment claim was time-barred, holding the filing dispute involved facts and that the suit was within time.
Safety Surveyors ltd v Kenindia Insurance Company Limited [2025] KEHC 10451 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Commercial Appeal E116 of 2024
Judge
BK Njoroge
The High Court held that the statutory thirty-day period for filing an application for review under Section 41(2) of the Small Claims Court Act is mandatory and cannot be extended by the procedural rules. The Appellant's application for review was filed outside this period without seeking leave for extension, and the explanation for delay was neither raised nor canvassed before the trial court. The Rules cannot override the Act, and the rationale for strict timelines is to ensure expeditious resolution of small claims. The appeal, being on a point of law, failed as the application for review…
Kemboi & 2 others v Land Registrar, Naivasha & 3 others [2025] KEELC 5362 (KLR)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2025
Judge
MC Oundo
The court found that the applicants' application for leave to apply for judicial review by way of certiorari was time barred, as the impugned decision by the Land Registrar was made on 19th January 2023 and the application was filed on 24th April 2025, well outside the six-month statutory limit prescribed by Section 9(3) of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court further held that the matter was res judicata, having already been determined in Naivasha CMCELC No. E037 of 2024 between the same parties and over the same subject matter, with a final judgment…
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E006 of 2025
Judge
CK Nzili
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The evidence showed that the suit land reverted to the government in 1991 after the 7th respondent defaulted on the Settlement Fund Trustees loan, and was subsequently allocated to the 1st-6th respondents. Under Section 41 of the Limitation of Actions Act, adverse possession cannot be claimed against government land. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of possession or development, nor did he refute the respondents' evidence regarding the land's status. Without a pr…
Republic v Tharaka Nithi County Public Service Board & another; Nicholas (Exparte Applicant) [2025] KEELRC 2053 (KLR)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
Judicial Review E004 of 2024
Judge
ON Makau
The court found the PSC delayed an employee’s appeal for over three years, amounting to procedural impropriety, but declined certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition.
Ngode v Transfleet Limited (Formerly Mugoya Construction Company) [2025] KEELRC 2024 (KLR)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
Cause 706 of 2019
Judge
JW Keli
The court dismissed a claim for unlawful termination and unpaid salary after finding the claimant failed to prove an employment relationship with the respondent.
The court found that the appellant filed the memorandum of appeal nine months after the judgment, far outside the statutory 30-day period prescribed by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant neither sought nor obtained leave of the court to file the appeal out of time, nor did she provide any explanation for the delay. The court held that an appeal filed out of time without leave is a nullity and cannot be cured by subsequent applications. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent was therefore upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Nuclear Investment Limited v Kinyanjui [2025] KEELRC 1998 (KLR)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
Appeal E008 of 2023
Judge
AN Mwaure
The court upheld a finding of unfair termination, dismissed the appeal, and reduced the underpayment award to reflect the three-year limitation period.