Rotich & 7 others v Yator & 14 others
Rotich & 7 others v Yator & 14 others [2025] KEELC 5432 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants were entitled to seek leave for a change of advocate post-judgment in compliance with Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules. There was no objection from the outgoing advocates regarding their removal, and the existence of pending applications justified the Applicants' need for representation. The court held that the issue of delay did not arise, as the Applicants had a right to be heard on matters affecting them. The objections raised by the Respondents regarding the authority to appoint advocates and the alleged lateness of the application were not s…
Source excerpt
- Change Of Advocate Post Judgment
- Representation Rights
- Order 9 Rule 9 Civil Procedure Rules
- Land Dispute Resolution
- Mediation Adoption
- Party Entitlement To Be Heard