Leruka v Kantilal Shah (Suing through his Duly Appointed Attorney Neelish Amratlal Shah) & 4 others
Leruka v Kantilal Shah (Suing through his Duly Appointed Attorney Neelish Amratlal Shah) & 4 others [2025] KEELC 3758 (KLR)
The appellate court found that the appellant did not acquire any rights or interests in the suit property from Nagin Chauhan, as there was no evidence of a completed sale, payment, or transfer of title to Nagin. Consequently, Nagin had no interest to transfer to the appellant, and the trial court correctly applied the nemo dat quod non habet principle. The appellant's challenge to the respondent's title was therefore unfounded. Regarding the refund of Ksh 1,500,000 plus interest awarded by the trial court, the appellate court held that this relief was neither pleaded nor proved by the appella…
Source excerpt
- Ownership Of Land
- Bona Fide Purchaser
- Fraudulent Transfer
- Pleadings And Relief
- Limitation Of Actions