Republic v Kiplagat & 8 others [2023] KEHC 27027 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Revision E010 of 2023
Judge
NW Sifuna
The High Court dismissed the DPP’s revision application, held it was aimed at frustrating the trial magistrate, and ordered the criminal case to resume and conclude within six months.
Republic/Prosecution v Dennis Ndara [2021] KEHC 1237 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Appeal 61 of 2019
Judge
BC Koech
The High Court dismissed the prosecution’s appeal, holding that no prima facie case was made out and that the trial magistrate properly refused recusal.
The High Court quashed a trial court order closing the prosecution case because the prosecutor was absent, and transferred the case to another magistrate.
Republic v Dennis Gitonga Manyara [2017] KEHC 2008 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Revision 291 of 2017
Judge
A Mabeya
The High Court declined revision of an acquittal, finding the trial court had properly applied section 210 after the prosecution appeared without a file or witnesses.
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions v Simeon Sagana Kanani, Lucas Matiko Chacha & Philip Okeyo Obure [2017] KEHC 9524 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Revision 48 of 2017
The High Court held that while the summary conviction of Mr. Momanyi for contempt of court was not subject to revision due to statutory limitations where an appeal lies, the trial court's order closing the prosecution case was irregular. The court found that the closure was premature, as the allocated hearing days had not been exhausted and the substitute prosecutor was not properly seized of the matter. The court further determined that the hostile environment created by the contempt proceedings and the subsequent closure of the case warranted the reopening of the prosecution case and its tr…
Republic v John Wandina Wambugu [2017] KEHC 8222 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Appeal 43 of 2014
The High Court found that the prosecution's case was riddled with contradictions and inconsistencies, particularly regarding the medical evidence and the number and timing of the complainant's lost teeth. The P3 form was unreliable, having been altered at the prosecutor's direction and lacking corroborative treatment records from the hospital where the complainant was allegedly treated. The trial magistrate was justified in finding that the prosecution had not established a prima facie case to require the respondent to be put on his defence. The court emphasized that it is not the role of the…
The High Court refused to revise a magistrate’s refusal of a prosecution adjournment, finding no illegality or impropriety and holding that a further delay would prejudice the accused’s fair-trial rights.
JAMES BANGA YANGAN & EUSTACE WAMURIA MAHINDA v REPUBLIC [2011] KEHC 2179 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 30 of 2011
The court found no sufficient legal basis to halt the ongoing criminal proceedings in Murang'a Criminal Case No. 788 of 2010. The applicants failed to demonstrate that their constitutional rights had been violated or that the prosecution and trial process were so compromised as to warrant intervention by the High Court. The issues raised regarding the involvement of police officers as prosecution witnesses and the presence of an advocate for the complainant did not amount to abuse of process or denial of a fair trial. The refusal by the trial magistrate to disqualify himself was a matter for…
REPUBLIC v GEOFFREY MUSYOKI KOMBO [2007] KEHC 908 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Appeal 100 of 2004
Judge
AT Sitati
The High Court at Machakos dismissed the State’s appeal, upheld the acquittal under section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and declined to order a retrial.