Masinde v Republic
Masinde v Republic [2025] KEHC 10593 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial magistrate failed to follow the due process required by section 131 of the Criminal Procedure Code before ordering the sale of the security deposited by the surety. Specifically, the magistrate did not ensure that the surety was served with summons or notice to show cause, nor was the surety given an opportunity to be heard or to produce the accused. The court emphasized that the exercise of judicial discretion in such matters must be guided by fairness, sound judgment, and adherence to statutory and constitutional requirements. The impugned order was made…
Source excerpt
- Bail And Bond Procedure
- Judicial Discretion
- Review Of Magistrate Decisions