AO v Republic
AO v Republic [2025] KEHC 8422 (KLR)
The court found that imposing a twenty-year custodial sentence on the appellant, who was a minor at the time of the offence and engaged in a mutual adolescent relationship, was unjust and counter-productive. The trial court failed to consider the appellant's age, the mutual nature of the relationship, and the best interests of the child born from the relationship. The court emphasized that both parties should have been treated equally and given an opportunity to reform. The interests of justice, the welfare of the child, and the views of the victim's family and community supported a non-custo…
Source excerpt
- Defilement
- Sentencing Of Minors
- Sexual Offences Act
- Best Interests Of Child
- Probation Orders