Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Njenga v Republic [2025] KEHC 10382 (KLR)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal for stealing by servant, holding that the prosecution’s key documentary evidence was inadmissible and insufficient.
Koros v Republic [2025] KEHC 9166 (KLR)
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal by a debt collector convicted of stealing by servant, holding that the evidence proved she received but did not remit Kshs. 441,000.
Songol v Republic [2025] KEHC 7916 (KLR)
The High Court at Eldoret dismissed a leniency application as moot after finding the appellant had already served the full four-year sentence for stealing by servant.
Mohamed v Republic [2025] KEHC 7800 (KLR)
The High Court at Kibera dismissed an application to review a four-year custodial sentence, finding no error, illegality, or procedural irregularity.
Nyabuti v Republic [2025] KEHC 5227 (KLR)
The High Court revised a sentence for stealing by servant and replaced the remaining custodial term with a two-month community service order.
Republic v Sayi & 2 others [2025] KEHC 4566 (KLR)
The High Court partly allowed the Republic’s appeal, convicted the respondents for conspiracy to defraud, and left intact their acquittals on the other counts.
Muthee v Republic [2025] KEHC 3707 (KLR)
High Court at Kibera held that a convict serving three years for stealing by servant was not eligible for sentence review under the prison decongestion program.
Njiru v Republic [2025] KEHC 3146 (KLR)
High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging a ruling placing the appellant on his defence, holding that the prosecution had established a prima facie case.
Dennis v Republic [2025] KEHC 2893 (KLR)
The High Court will not exercise its revisionary jurisdiction to interfere with a trial court's discretionary decision to allow a charge amendment during an ongoing trial where the magistrate properly exercised their discretion and the accused did not object at the time, as such intervention would amount to unjustified micro-management of trial proceedings and the correctness of the amendment is a matter for appeal, not revision.
Source excerpt
Cheboi & another v Republic [2025] KEHC 668 (KLR)
The convictions were unsafe and unsustainable due to a fundamental procedural defect (non-compliance with Section 200 CPC for the 2nd appellant), the prosecution's concession of several charges, the presence of substantial and unresolved contradictions in the key forensic evidence supporting the forgery charges, and the failure of the prosecution to prove the elements of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, including the absence of demonstrable loss or criminal intent, particularly when viewed against the backdrop of the appellants' roles and the corporation's parallel civil actions.
Source excerpt
Explore more
