Emfil Limited v Safaricom Limited
Emfil Limited v Safaricom Limited [2025] KECA 1331 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the appellant failed to prove its claim of trespass against the respondent because, at the time the respondent entered into the lease and erected the mast, the registered proprietor of the suit property was Jua Maisha Limited, and the respondent had no notice of any adverse claim or subsisting court order. The appellant did not produce a title to the suit property nor demonstrate actual or constructive possession at the material time. The court further found that the appellant did not specifically plead or strictly prove its claim for mesne profits, as required b…
Source excerpt
- Trespass To Land
- Mesne Profits
- Title Registration
- Injunctive Relief
- Burden Of Proof