Cosmas Wafula Ngutuku v John Waithaka, John Waithaka Kiarie & Richard Wainaina Waweru
Cosmas Wafula Ngutuku v John Waithaka, John Waithaka Kiarie & Richard Wainaina Waweru [2019] KEELC 2152 (KLR)
The court found that the advocate on record for the plaintiff did not possess a valid practicing certificate at all material times, rendering him unqualified to act as an advocate. Applying the clear statutory provisions of the Advocates Act and binding judicial precedents, the court held that pleadings drawn, signed, and filed by an unqualified person are void ab initio and cannot stand. The court rejected the respondent's reliance on Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, emphasizing that the lack of qualification to practice law is not a mere procedural technicality but a substantive legal…
Source excerpt
- Striking Out Pleadings
- Unqualified Advocate
- Validity Of Proceedings
- Practice And Procedure