Matete v Institute of Development Management (LC 146 of 0) [2002] LSLC 12 (9 August 2002)
No binding settlement was reached as there was no consensus on the amounts due; the applicant is entitled to reinstatement as Country Director because he was neither dismissed nor suspended, and his right to resume duty is inherent in law and contract.
- Citation
- [2002] LSLC 12
- Parties
- Applicant: Khoai Matete; Respondent: Institute of Development Management
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2002
- Case Number
- LC 146 of 0
- Procedural Posture
- Labour / Judgment
- Outcome
- Applicant's prayers granted as prayed in the Originating Application, subject to deductions.
- Legal Topics
- Secondment, Reinstatement, Settlement, Suspension, Contract of Employment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khoai Matete
Applicant
Institute of Development Management
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement as Country Director after secondment and acquittal
- 2 Whether a binding settlement was reached between the parties
- 3 Whether the applicant was lawfully suspended or dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
No binding settlement was reached as there was no consensus on the amounts due; the applicant is entitled to reinstatement as Country Director because he was neither dismissed nor suspended, and his right to resume duty is inherent in law and contract.
Court Disposition
Applicant's prayers granted as prayed in the Originating Application, subject to deductions.
Orders
- Applicant to be reinstated to his substantive post as Country Director.
- Applicant to be paid full salary and benefits from 1st October 1998 to date of reinstatement, less M67,000 earned through consultancies.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment