Sign in
Lesotho Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Lesotho Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Lesotho decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Civil procedure [2023] LSHC 126

Beleme Lebajoa V COMPOL (CIV/APN/0178/2022)

Beleme Lebajoa V COMPOL (CIV/APN/0178/2022) [2023] LSHC 126 (3 August 2023)

The High Court of Lesotho ordered the first respondent to pay wasted costs on an attorney-and-client scale after a last-minute recusal application caused a postponement.

  • Costs
  • Attorney-client costs
  • Abuse of process
  • Postponement
  • Recusal
  • Attorney-client-costs
Read case analysis
Company law [2023] LSHC 133

Maliehe V EuroTyres PTY LTD (CCA/0092/2022)

Maliehe V EuroTyres PTY LTD (CCA/0092/2022) [2023] LSHC 133 (3 August 2023)

The court dismissed a shareholder’s claim for payment of share value while the company remained undissolved, holding that any buy-out must follow section 41 of the Companies Act 2011.

  • Shareholder rights
  • Buy-out of shares
  • Company dissolution
  • Company-law
  • Shareholder-rights
  • Share-buyout
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2023] LSHC 257

Mathabo Lephoto V PS- Office of the Prime Minister & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0219/2022)

Mathabo Lephoto V PS- Office of the Prime Minister & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0219/2022) [2023] LSHC 257 (2 August 2023)

The withdrawal of concurrence by the 2nd respondent was a preliminary step in a multi-staged decision and did not have a direct legal effect on the applicant’s rights; thus, it was not reviewable. There was no legal obligation for the applicant to be heard at that stage, nor was there a proven failure to give reasons for a final decision. The applicant failed to establish a clear legal right to the transfer or the absence of an alternative remedy, precluding the grant of a mandamus.

  • Judicial review
  • Procedural fairness
  • Mandamus
  • Non-joinder
  • Audi alteram partem
  • Failure to give reasons
Read case analysis
Pension law [2023] LSHC 166

Mohaila Ralengau V Principal Secretary, Ministry of Education & 6 Others (CIV/APN/105/2021)

Mohaila Ralengau V Principal Secretary, Ministry of Education & 6 Others (CIV/APN/105/2021) [2023] LSHC 166 (5 July 2023)

The Government lawfully exercised its statutory right to set off the salary overpayment from the deceased's pension benefits after proper notice and consultation. The 6.2% deduction for operational costs is intra vires the Act, as the Minister is empowered to determine the rate of contributions, which may include operational costs. Payment of the full benefit without deduction would unjustly enrich the Applicants. No real dispute of fact existed to warrant oral evidence.

  • Set-off of debts from pension benefits
  • Ultra vires challenge to subsidiary legislation
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Procedural fairness in administrative action
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2023] LSHC 125

Mofomobe and Shale v. The Prime Minister and Others

Mofomobe and Shale v. The Prime Minister and Others (CONSTITUTIONAL CASE 7 of 2023; CONSTITUTIONAL CASE 9 of 2023) [2023] LSHC 125 (20 June 2023)

Section 26(2) of the National Security Service Act is unconstitutional as it lacks adequate safeguards against abuse, allowing executive warrants without independent oversight. The Minister who issued the warrants was not properly designated. The warrants were vague, overbroad, and failed to specify offences or provide sufficient factual basis. The seizure and search of applicants' cellphones violated their constitutional rights to privacy and freedom from arbitrary seizure of property. Investigation of murder and money laundering is outside the NSS mandate and requires judicially authorized…

  • Right to privacy
  • Search and seizure
  • National security
  • Judicial review
  • Separation of powers
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] LSHC 101

Rex V Moji (CRI/T/125/2012)

Rex V Moji (CRI/T/125/2012) [2023] LSHC 101 (19 May 2023)

The High Court of Lesotho admitted the accused’s confession, found corroborating evidence aliunde, and convicted him of murder and robbery.

  • Murder
  • Robbery
  • Confession
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Extenuating circumstances
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Arbitration [2023] LSHC 213

Letseng Diamond (PTY) Ltd V The President of the Law Society of Lesotho (CCA 19 of 2022)

Letseng Diamond (PTY) Ltd V The President of the Law Society of Lesotho (CCA 19 of 2022) [2023] LSHC 213 (11 May 2023)

The High Court dismissed an interlocutory bid to file late evidence and upheld the appointment of an arbitrator under a fuel supply contract’s arbitration clause.

  • Interpretation of arbitration clauses
  • Appointment of arbitrator
  • Procedural compliance in arbitration
  • Review of arbitral appointments
  • Arbitration
  • Contract-interpretation
Read case analysis
Tax law [2023] LSHC 19

Letsie Office Park (Pty) Ltd v Lesotho Revenue Authority (CIV (A) 02/2021)

Letsie Office Park (Pty) Ltd v Lesotho Revenue Authority (CIV (A) 02/2021) [2023] LSHC 19 (4 May 2023)

The High Court held that VAT vendor registration under section 17(1)(b) applies when taxable supplies begin, and upheld the Commissioner General's adjustment of the effective date.

  • Value added tax
  • Vendor registration
  • Input tax credit
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Value-added-tax
  • Vendor-registration
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2023] LSHC 90

Ramashamole V Mathiba (CCT/ 258 of 2022)

Ramashamole V Mathiba (CCT/ 258 of 2022) [2023] LSHC 90 (4 May 2023)

The High Court of Lesotho dismissed an application to rescind default judgment, holding the applicant was in wilful default and lacked a bona fide defence.

  • Rescission of judgment
  • Default judgment
  • Breach of contract
  • Rescission-of-judgment
  • Default-judgment
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Company law [2023] LSHC 23

Tsikoane v Tsikoane (CCA/0017/2019)

Tsikoane v Tsikoane (CCA/0017/2019) [2023] LSHC 23 (4 May 2023)

There is a deadlock in the management of the company due to irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence among shareholders, making it impossible to conduct business for their benefit; judicial dissolution is warranted under section 171(b)(i) of the Companies Act 2011.

  • Judicial dissolution
  • Deadlock in management
  • Shareholder disputes
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Lesotho decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.