Sign in
Lesotho Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Lesotho Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Lesotho decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law [2024] LSHC 119

Lesotho College of Education Staff Union V The Governing Council-Lesotho College of Education & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0175/2024)

Lesotho College of Education Staff Union V The Governing Council-Lesotho College of Education & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0175/2024) [2024] LSHC 119 (23 July 2024)

The High Court of Lesotho dismissed a staff union’s application over the Rector recruitment process, finding the applicant lacked locus standi to seek the reliefs.

  • Locus standi
  • Interdicts
  • Non-joinder
  • Urgency in applications
  • Locus-standi
  • Urgent-applications
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2024] LSHC 48

COLEPE V Maseru City Council & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0040/2024)

COLEPE V Maseru City Council & 4 Others (CIV/APN/0040/2024) [2024] LSHC 48 (28 March 2024)

The High Court dismissed an urgent challenge to refusal of a procession permit, holding that the applicants had not exhausted the statutory appeal to the Minister.

  • Exhaustion of local remedies
  • Freedom of association
  • Freedom of expression
  • Judicial review
  • Public processions
  • Urgency in applications
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2023] LSCA 4

Vishan Clothing Industries v Niminta Fashion (Pty) Ltd (C of A (CIV) 01/2023)

Vishan Clothing Industries v Niminta Fashion (Pty) Ltd (C of A (CIV) 01/2023) [2023] LSCA 4 (17 November 2023)

The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and granted anti-asset dissipation relief, finding a reasonable apprehension that assets were being moved to defeat judgment.

  • Urgency in applications
  • Mareva injunction
  • Anti-asset dissipation interdict
  • Attachment of assets
  • Costs orders
  • Mareva-injunction
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] LSHC 160

Platcorp Holdings Limited v Platinum Credit Limited (CCA/0109/2022)

Platcorp Holdings Limited v Platinum Credit Limited (CCA/0109/2022) [2022] LSHC 160 (14 December 2022)

The High Court of Lesotho varied interlocutory orders to account for FNB’s termination of its banking relationship with Platinum Credit Limited.

  • Variation of court orders
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Urgency in applications
  • Bank account management
  • Restoration of status quo ante
  • Variation-of-court-orders
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2022] LSHC 170

Jappie Catering v Ministry of Health (CCA/0113/2022)

Jappie Catering v Ministry of Health (CCA/0113/2022) [2022] LSHC 170 (15 November 2022)

Applicant failed to establish urgency as business loss does not justify preferential treatment; failed to prove a prima facie right or irreparable harm as contract had expired and no constitutional discrimination was shown; interim interdict requirements not met.

  • Urgency in applications
  • Interim interdicts
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Discrimination
  • Public procurement process
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] LSHC 139

Nthulenyane T/a Cheeze General Dealer v Broom of Africa (CCT/0418/2022)

Nthulenyane T/a Cheeze General Dealer v Broom of Africa (CCT/0418/2022) [2022] LSHC 139 (16 September 2022)

The High Court dismissed an urgent application for a temporary interdict, finding no urgency, no prima facie right, and material non-disclosure.

  • Temporary interdict
  • Urgency in applications
  • Material non-disclosure
  • Termination of contract
  • Costs
  • Temporary-interdict
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] LSHC 71

Platinum Credit Limited v First National Bank Lesotho (CCT/0241/2022)

Platinum Credit Limited v First National Bank Lesotho (CCT/0241/2022) [2022] LSHC 71 (5 August 2022)

The application was not urgent as the urgency was self-created, and the Applicant was abusing the court process by hastily instituting proceedings and failing to comply with previous court orders. The matter was dismissed for lack of urgency and abuse of process.

  • Urgency in applications
  • Abuse of court process
  • Freezing of bank accounts
  • Confidentiality of banking information
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] LSHC 110

Mokaeane v Palime (CIV/T/351/2021)

Mokaeane v Palime (CIV/T/351/2021) [2022] LSHC 110 (29 June 2022)

High Court of Lesotho refused rescission of an order dismissing a prior rescission application, holding that urgency was not shown and Rule 45(1)(a) was not met.

  • Rescission of judgment
  • Authority of counsel
  • Urgency in applications
  • Default judgment
  • Costs
  • Rescission-of-judgment
Read case analysis
Labour law [2015] LSLC 49

Mokhotho and Others v Mamohau Hospital (LC 25 of 2015)

Mokhotho and Others v Mamohau Hospital (LC 25 of 2015) [2015] LSLC 49 (10 August 2015)

The matter is not urgent as applicants failed to show they would not obtain substantial redress if heard in the ordinary course, and the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction over claims for unpaid wages, which must be referred to the DDPR.

  • Urgency in applications
  • Jurisdiction
  • Unpaid wages
  • Referral to arbitration
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2014] LSCA 33

Pokane and Another v Pokane and Others (C of A (CIV) 11 of 2014)

Pokane and Another v Pokane and Others (C of A (CIV) 11 of 2014) [2014] LSCA 33 (24 October 2014)

The Court of Appeal held an urgent ex parte application should not have been dismissed for lack of urgency or Rule 8(4) non-compliance, but factual disputes required trial.

  • Urgency in applications
  • Ex parte procedure
  • Conversion of application to trial
  • Interdicts
  • Administration of estates
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Lesotho decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.