18 Aug 2023
1. ) ABDUL AZIZ BIN DERASHID 2. ) ROSDIN BIN HANAFIAH 3. ) NOR ASMAWATI BINTI WAHAT 1. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO. BERHAD 2. ) MUHAMAD AYUB BIN ZULKIFLI 3. ) KAMARINA BINTI A. KARIM
- Citation
- CA-22NCvC-6-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- CA-22NCvC-6-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The High Court found the impugned Sessions Court judgment did not turn on enforcement of a trust or stakeholder issue but on Plaintiffs' obligation to show documentary proof of payment to their client; res judicata/issue estoppel and precedents (Asia Commercial, Kayveas, Stone World) precluded relitigation and a mere assertion of lack of jurisdiction was insufficient. Therefore the defendant's application under the Rules was meritorious and allowed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Res judicata / issue estoppel
- Stakeholders
- Enforcement of trusts
- Kaedah‑kaedah mahkamah 2012 rule 14a/rule 32
- Akta mahkamah rendah 1948 (s65(1)(a), s69(e))