1 Jan 1900
MUGHILAN A/L MANIMARAN (1) NILAVALAGAN A/L MURUGAM (2) PUSPALATHA A/P RAJAMANICKAM PENCELAH TOKYO MARINE INSURANS (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
- Citation
- BK – A53KJ-244-9/ 2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- BK – A53KJ-244-9/ 2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
The court allowed intervention because the applicant (insurer) demonstrated a timely, bona fide prima facie case and a sufficient nexus under s.96 RTA such that its rights and liabilities would be directly affected by any judgment; intervention under O.15 r.6(2)(b)(ii) was necessary to effectually and completely determine disputed issues (including alleged fraud) and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
- Intervention/joinder of parties
- Insurer's duty to satisfy judgments (s.96 rta)
- Allegation of fraud in pleadings
- Conflict of interest for insurer-appointed solicitors