Sign in
Namibia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Namibia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Namibia decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2016] NAHCMD 174

S v Williem (CA 2 of 2016)

S v Williem (CA 2 of 2016) [2016] NAHCMD 174 (17 June 2016)

The conviction for attempted rape was not supported by evidence beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies and contradictions in the complainant's evidence, failure to properly apply the cautionary rule for single witness testimony, and misdirection regarding the burden of proof.

  • Rape
  • Attempted rape
  • Burden of proof
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Single witness rule
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2015] NAHCMD 180

Binga v S (CA 96 of 2014)

Binga v S (CA 96 of 2014) [2015] NAHCMD 180 (8 May 2015)

The conviction was based on corroborated evidence from the complainant and another witness, not solely on a single witness. Missing portions of the record did not materially affect the court's ability to consider the merits. The appellant's version was highly improbable, and the magistrate was correct in accepting the State's evidence and rejecting the defence.

  • Corruption
  • Evidence
  • Appeal procedure
  • Single witness rule
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] NAHC 175

Kapia v S (CA 91 of 2010)

Kapia v S (CA 91 of 2010) [2011] NAHC 175 (20 June 2011)

Appeal in a rape conviction was upheld after the High Court found flaws in the evaluation of a child witness’s evidence and lack of assistance to an unrepresented accused.

  • Rape
  • Evidence of child witnesses
  • Single witness rule
  • Right to fair trial
  • Duty to assist unrepresented accused
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] NAHC 83

S v Dawids (CA 29 of 2009)

S v Dawids (CA 29 of 2009) [2011] NAHC 83 (18 March 2011)

Appeal dismissed in a rape conviction case, with the High Court upholding the complainant’s identification evidence and the 20-year sentence.

  • Rape
  • Identification evidence
  • Single witness rule
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] NAHC 42

S v Epafras (CA 32 of 2009)

S v Epafras (CA 32 of 2009) [2011] NAHC 42 (18 February 2011)

The High Court of Namibia upheld an appeal against a rape conviction, finding material contradictions in the complainant’s evidence and inadequate corroboration.

  • Rape
  • Sexual offences
  • Evidence
  • Single witness rule
  • Burden of proof
  • Credibility of witnesses
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2006] NAHC 38

S v Nowaseb (1) (CA 51 of 2005)

S v Nowaseb (1) (CA 51 of 2005) [2006] NAHC 38 (28 July 2006)

High Court appeal against a conviction for reckless or negligent driving was dismissed. The court upheld the trial court’s credibility findings and sentence.

  • Reckless or negligent driving
  • Appeal procedure
  • Evaluation of evidence
  • Single witness rule
  • Sentencing
  • Reckless-driving
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Namibia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.