New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

New Zealand Case Law

Appropriate procedure for review vs appeal
  • 22 Oct 2010

    WONG & HO V THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL AND ORS HC AK CIV-2010-404-001751

    Citation
    openlaw-9047480f_903b_4762_b7f9_613af0313cd4.pdf
    Court
    High Court

    The Tribunal applied the wrong evidential/test standard by requiring cogent evidence against respondents rather than treating the pleaded facts as true; given undisputed documentary matters (joint ownership, building consent naming owners/applicants, builder recorded as AP Dougherty Ltd, site visits and sale to appellants) the allegation respondents were developers was at least arguable and could not be struck out without a hearing; consequently the removal order was set aside.

    • Weathertight claims
    • Strike-out/removal of parties
    • Developer duty of care
    • Limitation period
    • Appropriate procedure for review vs appeal