11 Nov 2010
CRAYFISH COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2010-404-3601
- Citation
- openlaw-4035d844_353a_4c89_9919_a39355b0f9eb.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because a majority of proprietors and mortgagees supported the SPUD, all required notices were given and no substantive dissent was shown or advanced, the court, applying s58 and the Geddes principle of inquiring into dissent, granted the order to deposit the substituted proposed unit development plan.
- Subdivision of unit titles
- Deposit of substituted proposed unit development plan (spud)
- Consent of registered proprietors and mortgagees
- Court order under s58
- Notice and right to be heard