10 Aug 2023
SINGH v MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2023] NZHC 2139
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 2139
- Court
- High Court
The High Court found no material error in the District Court's assessment: the appellant's repeated, deliberate and premeditated provision of false information over several years carried moderate to serious gravity; religious influence mitigated culpability only to a limited extent because the appellant retained agency and leadership roles; the adverse effects relied upon flow from the dishonest conduct rather than from the mere fact of a conviction; consequently the s107 threshold was not met and the refusal of discharge under s106 was correct; appeal dismissed.
- Discharge without conviction s106 sentencing act 2002
- Disproportionality test s107 sentencing act 2002
- Providing false or misleading information to immigration officer s342 immigration act 2009
- Admission and assessment of fresh evidence on appeal
- Religious influence/mitigation vs culpability